IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-07.txt

DY Kim <dykim6@gmail.com> Fri, 04 August 2017 10:49 UTC

Return-Path: <dykim6@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9B38131FC6 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Aug 2017 03:49:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SRjJFR6X1gQV for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Aug 2017 03:49:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x244.google.com (mail-pg0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1403131CFE for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Aug 2017 03:49:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x244.google.com with SMTP id y192so1484074pgd.1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 04 Aug 2017 03:49:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=kSbaC3FclqMBEXwCfiuRn55HACdTlAoclqiPgfUAeLE=; b=JVZhzE/WW8FidMJquHUqgIZfawQPGpZbuopcpFR9aquq0roPp5A8pI05v5wisWdnpA a+hQEqZ6sJbtki72VNrrB2xRnb4gREB2s8Ofs1p2ES8cWuGo3/YzmDLkfbLFDuYKCebJ tXnLPLHXvMYdGdq7JqSub+N4/cg61vd/rHZYSRpD4ZTW4NAuJWF5yF39EQg4nIBEsTaG 0FVJIsjxBtuMLZIGO9rUFF2YC3U3ot/rJDRPpCuMO0gGnQh51tjzT+pdFsC10eeUMB+n dQU6R9qr5BmXi7mjc1oiOOqmvCoPyt0OsAv/IC1hW/Uju/RKRcR5oEg4mbOwAY97pR4+ EFww==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=kSbaC3FclqMBEXwCfiuRn55HACdTlAoclqiPgfUAeLE=; b=JlX9pRKpi+4x29dfOsEtYYhIEmL6wvX2xd74KaS3U1Pg69drNXKs8Mf9YatJNnU/RI MDpIffUz7Vm+FyzWmv9W/uHcfHpfxooackwLUz/43z7rcmwNMA7Pan0T8/hMPlfP5VSJ l5HYJA6ufQn3vtXXpjaaixY5Pc87nrCWDSF7IkVaND1P9voScrHQJnlVDYAH7x5vCiPi PwmUiKze7NptovaATJWpfkaP4mNkaeiLkeTfi6Iq2aSN3w2jgv1uyzo1sgRJi09v3tnK dxv6IH29SOWKEVX4708obzeTotM/Iswrgye039WmWhrxV/1+BzXFHalhiHHMtI9tQuz0 4Efw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw113zbANmhlbBIDlz4u9M5nJ65Y2SIUQDffj6fp6UtGuSsq9W+qZt FObpobvPPoZrPQ==
X-Received: by 10.84.217.78 with SMTP id e14mr2276525plj.394.1501843775423; Fri, 04 Aug 2017 03:49:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [112.167.24.200] ([112.167.24.200]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d86sm2588999pfk.43.2017.08.04.03.49.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 04 Aug 2017 03:49:34 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: DY Kim <dykim6@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <801ACC98-2A54-40CF-B6F5-7B36CEC99CDA@jisc.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2017 19:49:32 +0900
Cc: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>, v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7FA8C6A0-9410-408F-9AC9-B3FB9C3D6B38@gmail.com>
References: <150148445751.17707.15424999122129322815@ietfa.amsl.com> <E6AC9174-3D6E-4FAD-B84B-B7E58FB149BC@gmail.com> <CAO42Z2xEs6RauD6Oo_NbqOh+FRVAu3NuveewSvRx7g1hS2-ToQ@mail.gmail.com> <94BC4E17-D490-4F50-9E99-2AAA081CD43C@gmail.com> <CAO42Z2zR_bWPqOHM7-RNsPX78np45UV=J67YD5gbpoCPUaLkAQ@mail.gmail.com> <FB14455C-F00E-49A4-936F-03BD44C4D42C@gmail.com> <CAO42Z2zLgw3cYapf=1y9pm4cWMZZ32DT2ryfPb6BGUFjCfmrMg@mail.gmail.com> <6950ACA0-CAB9-4890-ABE3-0ECA84C58251@gmail.com> <801ACC98-2A54-40CF-B6F5-7B36CEC99CDA@jisc.ac.uk>
To: Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/nu2r7PgtxGyObuuPMVDgFgijvjQ>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-07.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2017 10:49:37 -0000

OK.

--------
Regards,
DY








> On 4 Aug 2017, at 19:03, Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> For enough randomization in that case, I might like to have enough (say 48) additional bits for the node prefix, rendering 48+48=96; 48 is shorter than 64, but should be large enough for randomization for privacy.
> 
> That’s off piste for this draft. And a discussion already thrashed out in other threads, and also discussed in RFC7421.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email