IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-07.txt

DY Kim <dykim6@gmail.com> Fri, 04 August 2017 06:57 UTC

Return-Path: <dykim6@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6219A1317A4 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 23:57:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id td5ixOiniDgj for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 23:57:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x22c.google.com (mail-pg0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7845131C20 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 23:57:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id u5so4537059pgn.0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 03 Aug 2017 23:57:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=rCaeXeGeDquhsHq6GeLAEi8e4vJczO42QUNzFrz7eqs=; b=dJI857mLFoDuOXTb8XtCZyDsIgZXYgU5EVNdgEDR/SWuBlEDNTo8e8oSCenn5oG9Wz dduUwYvYqgsxYiT1QUnS2hSa/3+UUvyzK2etOujW5RmJQR89mNZ4/+zIqaOpblIt7yfX BtbM7MiLNPfyROzZVdJgrVznpbm24jXNl9CuIR59ed+QpbYfIH0mIA891H7hvGxhdH35 CpeXhcI2Iluf2arN5PFhF/pz/SvwoqnIHJFItTL3leTdp7xLLolZzoV5pq5GVW3oGdfQ IEZQOfwyTBzMlm8etXsfLQp7JvCDr2oJyp4s1hSJkarg4HrOUOLKkYo8rdoxVDgnpIRd IvtQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=rCaeXeGeDquhsHq6GeLAEi8e4vJczO42QUNzFrz7eqs=; b=rgYXJ+EYJaJ1in1A2ishg0mqabrBDpu2XUsLaVV4iXySmgEJGPPR575EOqyZhIuFT9 fuiz9422qBjIWcrhal2VFDuR/6SKyp38MWO6N1+DDi4EhZZ7nXBiCF0Z42p2O/nJhSHw RMgGoImtJ33CNIvHdopAsVbSqekT3b+Qd2QG+LNUxjBav5+6LINWpg4D+gGlfQnn/v3k JY2by4jpPNooG7L6+mT+7or8GIoG343Mgu09Bc1VkN5pK8ZmO7DWaNfqbGz1kOCXeNam +QiBAM7nR7iZ8j2nzhnfsotX4UpTj6/QxqKKUw3OL8crv6NrbNb0tMPonglCzvlV5hx2 F7ew==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw1137FpPIBAljf8O80Xd1bCYgFFwICXJ9Isn47kqgyrkyjuiuK+Mj p7heWJPYD+YHIjfP4RY=
X-Received: by 10.84.215.210 with SMTP id g18mr1626920plj.210.1501829876437; Thu, 03 Aug 2017 23:57:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [112.167.24.200] ([112.167.24.200]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z64sm948299pgz.40.2017.08.03.23.57.55 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 03 Aug 2017 23:57:55 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: DY Kim <dykim6@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1708040512220.2261@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2017 15:57:52 +0900
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4E2E0371-EA83-4A47-AD4D-CA48220EED2B@gmail.com>
References: <150148445751.17707.15424999122129322815@ietfa.amsl.com> <2E470571-1620-4527-9489-D4D953000040@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1708040512220.2261@uplift.swm.pp.se>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/Zkeejkf7-HLneH6LZRK9n4qveYI>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-07.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2017 06:57:58 -0000

Thanks.

Regards,
DY








> On 4 Aug 2017, at 12:12, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 4 Aug 2017, DY Kim wrote:
> 
>> At the end of Sec. 4, it reads:
>> 
>> "After the UE/subscriber received the RA, and the associated flags, it
>>  will assign itself a 128 bit IPv6 address using SLAAC.  Since the
>>  address is composed by the UE/subscriber device itself, it will need
>>  to verify that the address is unique on the shared network.  The UE/
>>  subscriber will for that purpose, perform Duplicate Address Detection
>>  algorithm.  This will occur for each address the UE attempts to
>>  utilize on the shared provider managed network.”
>> 
>> Now the each device has a unique prefix, there’d be no chance that 128 bit addresses generated by different devices should collide. Do we need DAD here?
> 
> No, we don't.
> 
> That is what https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pioxfolks-6man-pio-exclusive-bit-02 is about.
> 
> -- 
> Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email