Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-07.txt

DY Kim <dykim6@gmail.com> Fri, 04 August 2017 08:43 UTC

Return-Path: <dykim6@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1B03124234 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Aug 2017 01:43:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tdL_1-j_vQZm for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Aug 2017 01:43:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x234.google.com (mail-pg0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C93FF131C6C for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Aug 2017 01:43:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x234.google.com with SMTP id v189so5437506pgd.2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 04 Aug 2017 01:43:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=3XJ5y7gTytMuQ7lKa8gB4XnuIuu/l334i74Q7JeXFxY=; b=d4HeVlmAA9GeNIX1Uq+EbuQVcWdaP+CRiNSgmhzG9eINM+AlSlV+XQEIctHviwfR0S ZSTNbvaGrrpMuDjwFfvEF0GVLWdlOBFepKUZdT8cqdQpiAqUcrqh8Fw2b0+YaiGsQWW5 8A283xPlBne7rhlzdWpwb6mWXr+V0316yFNrOwF/qZmyWxBt2LvQbRl4S8l/zXGHjedi sD99B/6R9FGNpBk7LkgN3ybf3UKSsrxLqeMW4/fvBRPwPb5m921wROwo50utYEnVIe+l lBvO0HyVwnCXAgv9T34QxVYUb6xXqDZUZkPUxHCQTLMMnvWTUDWygVLv3dciHbEB1vFn 3N6Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=3XJ5y7gTytMuQ7lKa8gB4XnuIuu/l334i74Q7JeXFxY=; b=QIjeW6Z6AXkaBqcwZlpr3Qyyfm2jENuAlIJHINV6F3Fp/VIwjsS5fr6WTa4N56fBsV zkO4CZ33OhWGo+frJwm/MAVHJ+n+l/hvbF3OkkxVptQYQhy7ZA5CL1h5YHhNjP3ZMh5f 3+q4yvNJCY2kXNpXgW788Z6QhniweC2SvDwL9Y4iMlGy7tC/xI/0VPn740SSTd1TVT86 vk3e0wLh+2U1C9AYWXH+c666RoKTmZqzL08ZazcQKBFsU950VBTfsgkIpFbT1fjBSlXW 8P0VJR5XXuq5ivzgQOXRoqceHDFriZkeUcK3Pt2tN8Zmm7tRmZsoOG2Y6rTnLCFTJu2x yVOw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw113KsP1KtxG9iODoku/IWdW5LWMLUx3wfKD9yNX/fwgZwMFE/2Qu z59Uod/DcuLCeCzp1G8=
X-Received: by 10.101.87.205 with SMTP id q13mr1566968pgr.359.1501836213329; Fri, 04 Aug 2017 01:43:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [112.167.24.200] ([112.167.24.200]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t11sm2024925pfa.143.2017.08.04.01.43.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 04 Aug 2017 01:43:32 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: DY Kim <dykim6@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1708041013350.2261@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2017 17:43:30 +0900
Cc: v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0E577FCD-857E-4F2D-947B-D4AA201DE346@gmail.com>
References: <150148445751.17707.15424999122129322815@ietfa.amsl.com> <2E470571-1620-4527-9489-D4D953000040@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1708040512220.2261@uplift.swm.pp.se> <336987B8-56B0-4C59-A9B1-8B91D4D09BD1@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1708040927370.2261@uplift.swm.pp.se> <3D12AB07-7CE4-4625-ADDF-5F7CEC8CB115@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1708041013350.2261@uplift.swm.pp.se>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/PYv5c2YNjpLuZiJS36NAtObKsfQ>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-07.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2017 08:43:35 -0000

All mentioned in 4291bis is the subnet prefix, not the node prefix.

--------
Regards,
DY








> On 4 Aug 2017, at 17:15, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> wrote:
> 
> So it doesn't change any standards, it tries to describe a deployment scenario, working within currently deployed standards.