IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-07.txt

DY Kim <dykim6@gmail.com> Fri, 04 August 2017 07:35 UTC

Return-Path: <dykim6@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FE1D132144 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Aug 2017 00:35:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id byFT3LBYNp7t for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Aug 2017 00:35:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x234.google.com (mail-pg0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5BFF132145 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Aug 2017 00:35:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x234.google.com with SMTP id u5so4871667pgn.0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:35:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=wWKLVvz631YYZWLb4bDo+4h1eSwdnd63w2VeLDzKVGY=; b=nUKJvgfvpNjULVO5FBmyMfaRDV6bK73sGCBHBRrn/thCuVqMN/VSaGeGChoG2kC45h J2bJWm6vEZM7/fZGOxD6xrcqvG/ABiuW8tFVC33+AWxm0GPVU1nKnSNvQoEthayxagyi C40KVYqgn+4CSIlyFbSTsEmTIFogPwrs7AYk8JxDVWEKnKMN6DQVOOeAncrfqIICY2mf eQcu1tfkOUvk8Nlocz0kpS5YVUnVBK9OSulzBU0cJYLH8Jm4eGtDMY/ZdYid3VstuzwC rk0kSH50BpooKMw4iQl/2bFSM1wZssmA7ATK1Tq2/LJn6dW5e9qGHAtydF3R3XfUnLYt 3CaA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=wWKLVvz631YYZWLb4bDo+4h1eSwdnd63w2VeLDzKVGY=; b=qIAStDTmjAR7G8CUG/EyVJdk73x3mcQ+IXKMP95026xFuvWYfnq9cm8kQD/kRPmTT9 IbCKVYa5F1ZR1h2ADUjwNvveAgqgulom4PGaw1oQvSnjaL2XHnM+F/a9oZ+PafqjoWxT 9rJ79Bns2ivzy9oy7B+oxkeeu459mR5YAO5V1o6d0pZLXKcaipayEfLl3pYgh6tX/pyV 0S6UV27m8ojGXItfbhaMCaENp7kkKZ+4/YS6NBdHqRv1jijHHLiWzbkBale/2DYCXBfU 2+READOcAy2m5ZCEkgSKp16B9siW11/bXDA5by5DzcZ8TsWtYXxId9nlBKPY5qUu38lf LMgw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw110yVIjJoiAR2MpYA9QmeijNupsd/xzuqt5+9XhifWhrPynV9zn2 2b/cA3aeWCOYFQ==
X-Received: by 10.84.214.137 with SMTP id j9mr1620400pli.457.1501832102272; Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:35:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [112.167.24.200] ([112.167.24.200]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v86sm2253673pfa.6.2017.08.04.00.35.00 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:35:01 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: DY Kim <dykim6@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1708040927370.2261@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2017 16:34:59 +0900
Cc: v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3D12AB07-7CE4-4625-ADDF-5F7CEC8CB115@gmail.com>
References: <150148445751.17707.15424999122129322815@ietfa.amsl.com> <2E470571-1620-4527-9489-D4D953000040@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1708040512220.2261@uplift.swm.pp.se> <336987B8-56B0-4C59-A9B1-8B91D4D09BD1@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1708040927370.2261@uplift.swm.pp.se>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/XT37CYG-HEwGDJaKZlMB16xEnlc>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-07.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2017 07:35:04 -0000

Oh… I meant the I-D in cited in the subject field of this thread; unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host.

The I-D says it’s intended status is BCP.

----------
Regards,
DY








> On 4 Aug 2017, at 16:28, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 4 Aug 2017, DY Kim wrote:
> 
>> So, you need neither ND nor DAD with the proposed BCP…?
> 
> If you're talking about PIO-X, then correct.
> 
> It's not BCP, it's currently intended to be experimental.
> 
> -- 
> Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email