Re: [v6ops] draft-palet-v6ops-transition-ipv4aas discussion

["Ackermann, Michael" <[e-mail]>]

This is good work and will be helpful/beneficial  to organizations transitioning to IPv6.   

I am wondering why large enterprises are expressly excluded from the scope of the document.  

I support this as a WG document.  

Thanks

Mike


-----Original Message-----
From: v6ops [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Fred Baker
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2018 6:40 PM
To: V6 Ops List <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-palet-v6ops-transition-ipv4aas discussion



> On Apr 18, 2018, at 11:17 AM, Lee Howard <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> I think this document is needed.

So, in addition to the authors, we have three people (Richard, Barbara, and Lee) that have said to the list that this document "is needed", by which I infer that they want it to be adopted as a working group document. That said, as I said to Fred Templin a few weeks ago, that isn't proof of a consensus.

The chairs would be interested to know how many do, and how many do not, want that to happen. If you have specific arguments, relevance to your part of the world, and so on, that's important too.


The information contained in this communication is highly confidential and is intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom this communication is directed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. Please notify the sender, by electronic mail or telephone, of any unintended receipt and delete the original message without making any copies.
 
 Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan and Blue Care Network of Michigan are nonprofit corporations and independent licensees of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association.