IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-palet-v6ops-transition-ipv4aas discussion

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 25 April 2018 00:38 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92F6C12D87E for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2018 17:38:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cdUDcbD4XuPd for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2018 17:38:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot0-x229.google.com (mail-ot0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7C64126D85 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Apr 2018 17:38:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot0-x229.google.com with SMTP id l22-v6so12897926otj.0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Apr 2018 17:38:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=FyYWNVNsVnMCY61AyHxaGFhBtRR0IFovPUHScUnnTkk=; b=n7hN7nKuw+vl5o9vGBO9KLF5iA2ToPFufoJdWFg7znB3LXq/EBXKLugLR03vkwFppa +X+GzqELMrRAj6VMwAYTYrVTy0KV4xysz+lUai7otvuSJr6O0cGsQYMCVls987oIHZYj BIn9RV/uRMKED4GSq3TRRRRfo5LKrKoSIlRmwaNkASt9QgThqQdfbhRgB/Whazsu90jA INWDXIZRfKc4wFAhw2/xyrZqd+TAy4CAhBgURPUSTfx7vld1IELPd1vFm6xmRQAM/Qcf XJ4tdYphaA/ySsv8fnZ9H1vv1LpUQOuVx2O3R+1SLv/cMstuQJhPiy32S26E8sgkEJOo wYOw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=FyYWNVNsVnMCY61AyHxaGFhBtRR0IFovPUHScUnnTkk=; b=FGnVMIhRWOjuF5GpVarvqIP+K9ZaM0E2ZCCf7+oxpA9PPCO0fMAQyka0BwQQAB6Pq1 hHh4DbN87JLJj5AiNp/vCc0BYnAoG7oeI+Y5PUdQ2m7SlEAQ91Tr0UqZtujb2O8Xd8US 3cuwFh4fnjwx41xdLXhCEbvSF6OZjyPFD/JcvznTNR2FJrJ1F/tsgGBAbhARq/9cC6Ez AK4vSCSKoSz1IOLiViJhmFtqf4W4+pKHZ/tvMG530dQbTgqlaqZN04zA+69XMcpkr5M2 PedUqjwDs7K5DHpPa47OLKXjXN3kUDjxl31IZa//S3Z1R7OYJ9I63eDN5u1enPUDE2Zk gUjw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tDmA6xfpM1uKiIBb/PQ7XkBhzCbo5EjaSF3tNYgwe4fbSHQKwXY ieFBLYg4WGD/sxcbzr49l24=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4/NrbTpFIDEUCx8eWmEV8ZHVa63RzDdI9dLki81WO0P23eA+sKj2bJrJ7S2KgIq8gGPNO7WtA==
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:605:: with SMTP id 5-v6mr18846201otn.360.1524616690351; Tue, 24 Apr 2018 17:38:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:8802:5600:1546::12af? ([2600:8802:5600:1546::12af]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u23-v6sm1681734oiv.45.2018.04.24.17.38.08 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 24 Apr 2018 17:38:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <ECDF4B32-1A4E-49A9-9255-091F2FEA78AF@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_6FD0B14B-CF6A-4A49-9330-2E014E176460"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.3 \(3445.6.18\))
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 17:38:07 -0700
In-Reply-To: <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114DD7F981@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com>
Cc: V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>
To: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>
References: <3A083AA8-41D3-4BF8-BE31-5071975B6F98@gmail.com> <CAHL_VyC1xUDDqZRz1r--u8nyuLaZRnsT0ZR7hzOw4HWUkgwPXg@mail.gmail.com> <52D64464-A1BB-4FFA-AA79-28B8953E3B93@gmail.com> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114DD7F981@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.6.18)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/PcDUZYv8G-8mM7lnFdSKXnXVLs4>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-palet-v6ops-transition-ipv4aas discussion
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 00:38:12 -0000


> On Apr 24, 2018, at 12:13 PM, STARK, BARBARA H <bs7652@att.com> wrote:
> 
> But that doesn't mean I believe the draft has exactly the right set of features included. My understanding of "adoption" is that it is still possible post-adoption to discuss whether specific features / requirements do or don't belong. If the precise set of features and requirements must be agreed upon prior to adoption, then I would not be in support of adoption. Hopefully we aren't setting the bar that high?

I understand "adoption as a working group draft" to mean that the working group has agreed to work on the draft. There are some working groups that seem to confuse "adoption as a work group draft" with "agreement to send it to the IESG"; I don't, but expect conversation in between those two events.

That said, I'd like to believe that the draft is pretty close, and that changes that need to be made to it will have text offered by the people that want them. So - keep your cards and letters coming...

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email