IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-palet-v6ops-transition-ipv4aas discussion

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Thu, 19 April 2018 04:25 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94D99129C56 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 21:25:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=swm.pp.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gZdQW0ApZkvI for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 21:25:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C9B4128961 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 21:25:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id E9F5CB0; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 06:25:10 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1524111910; bh=jkPyAeKxsd01xBnPFE4tQJ6KLeI83+tjjtVmdUag3yc=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Ey8ew0SX/rAzEel67NUpzjqx2N39aLUorigzJQJCOhs6Un53Vas8Af/5OktzLEdF8 5JMjZ2QpTwGZSjy8eajakvuIkcLcX1mrPRHUYUA5xdCKlmI9O6Le3yNiKdROd7c0uB nMFSHsyhRZO++670zF/nzm/oGNwqjBD+g+3xa0bU=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6FCFAF; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 06:25:10 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 06:25:10 +0200
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
cc: V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <29D3B2CE-C47B-4474-82F6-793122E99FF6@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1804190621580.18650@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <3A083AA8-41D3-4BF8-BE31-5071975B6F98@gmail.com> <43764aef-3aef-4269-cba8-94685ee4673f@asgard.org> <29D3B2CE-C47B-4474-82F6-793122E99FF6@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/_2PNa7ynPhRj-LGHTTyfZTLj7P0>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-palet-v6ops-transition-ipv4aas discussion
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 04:25:16 -0000

On Wed, 18 Apr 2018, Fred Baker wrote:

> The chairs would be interested to know how many do, and how many do not, 
> want that to happen. If you have specific arguments, relevance to your 
> part of the world, and so on, that's important too.

I support this document to be adopted and just the way I think RFC7084 
helps ISPs formulate requirements and also get an overview of what's 
available and what behaviour the device should have in an easy all-in-one 
document, I think ipv4aas document would we worthwhile in this area.

I point to RFC7084 quite often in discussions, I imagine I will use the 
end product of this document in the same way.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email