IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-palet-v6ops-transition-ipv4aas discussion

Richard Patterson <richard@helix.net.nz> Fri, 27 April 2018 12:46 UTC

Return-Path: <richard@helix.net.nz>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 621B4120724 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Apr 2018 05:46:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.611
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.611 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=helix-net-nz.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CGCvHH0zfSAH for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Apr 2018 05:46:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x235.google.com (mail-it0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92681120713 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Apr 2018 05:46:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x235.google.com with SMTP id c3-v6so1631327itj.4 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Apr 2018 05:46:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=helix-net-nz.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=BBm4VYTzCtY9t7UsOWJtXB17RCrlpvjL6ppvI7YtrNg=; b=qT/lEkMJUH4733ijnsUp0IbkMr7EI9hVmEfw/shXz8RC5zqAcl/UV00MPdBxfGlzLJ 2iIk0sevRnVBhyYpe3FJRFtn0XZiTeJVnFqYcG0lnaNa5ZV9DDYAdSI4NCyG1g6v0xCw 5kyC+iQ1yrhlm0rcqAXvGvNYLb4VD+xMBEH8BlZHzu9IrQ/Sh8eGy05Id9Z6NAyKdbo5 JjyzAot6ooiRRCdYXGSzMmRO6SXWCLGTCnIOZyQOWWpOrfRNkReTJoZBTgGTVVAmUvSO ig35p7fsZpBl66V1lgA4SBX3XJhxh9LXgiW5+OE7snVIo6w1tos6RqRWRaulnQf1v5+5 Gbzg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=BBm4VYTzCtY9t7UsOWJtXB17RCrlpvjL6ppvI7YtrNg=; b=On+ZRoFPb/oRZSnKnnOSM2yFCKhc+vjgULtKAom315PhZ75/tyAtgdSJSH85Vnbtbp JB7xi3gzTLwXVv3wkKPz1/Nnno82UFlxJvHfXK3ya9Y/EoEtr7wgI2FTilA0xICPOi9T ltbBfrYj/g9KUgW91+pi586GtcFTa7kB1V1aIHzIx686QHf46eNPeGI9YwZBegCbKhH6 zqvwCJwE6qOnSLFAOE6QGbeGPeVis/EDkvVBFEDtaLw/15t37i4V2COJeQSrR9UoSdvu BQp7MkutDvf5po0CESsQjhxWjzCwWboVeWdfnfMzCNQgsrZuLxJWwNgkfZ3aaCjyI0x5 ptYg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tB8ToG/Vj2fHv6anMz/vnsRlOhSjjh7z3uK65HNYl4m4YDGD2k3 FRf4iQmH3q9nMd+NlwqZJF2lktwM
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZokWdkloP5Avunj2/YEuGN63A2oPnO2Kh4gnWXXL5f1e5scAmjwYmZLw1r/6peTr30CAhc73w==
X-Received: by 2002:a24:ee0d:: with SMTP id b13-v6mr1696180iti.19.1524833177407; Fri, 27 Apr 2018 05:46:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-f175.google.com (mail-io0-f175.google.com. [209.85.223.175]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j195-v6sm440791itb.40.2018.04.27.05.46.16 for <v6ops@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 27 Apr 2018 05:46:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-f175.google.com with SMTP id d73-v6so2302176iog.3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Apr 2018 05:46:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:afe4:: with SMTP id p97-v6mr635486ioo.257.1524833176544; Fri, 27 Apr 2018 05:46:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <3A083AA8-41D3-4BF8-BE31-5071975B6F98@gmail.com> <CAHL_VyC1xUDDqZRz1r--u8nyuLaZRnsT0ZR7hzOw4HWUkgwPXg@mail.gmail.com> <52D64464-A1BB-4FFA-AA79-28B8953E3B93@gmail.com> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114DD7F981@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com> <ECDF4B32-1A4E-49A9-9255-091F2FEA78AF@gmail.com> <CAHL_VyBnRkmpNDcwqTTxu8DnUGFAdKgL+PB1pt9yFLQ==cM0aA@mail.gmail.com> <D8000940-273D-4C25-8B71-F75833B74462@consulintel.es> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93302DF126EC@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <694A1FF1-CA8C-42CC-87F3-789EA71807AE@employees.org> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93302DF12849@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <CAHL_VyA7AnhHQ6ktJ9ySTSjdrZ-JKZBpzJok8tLo+5Vhpcd4iw@mail.gmail.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93302DF12AC0@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
In-Reply-To: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93302DF12AC0@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
From: Richard Patterson <richard@helix.net.nz>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 12:46:06 +0000
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAHL_VyCrvfJeThcXEH+nJmHExju9yQsjdtU8-cMn47BBi_eTWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHL_VyCrvfJeThcXEH+nJmHExju9yQsjdtU8-cMn47BBi_eTWQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "v6ops@ietf.org list" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/StPV_qKpfhvb8toITlEghVAsPq4>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-palet-v6ops-transition-ipv4aas discussion
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 12:46:20 -0000

On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 at 13:03, <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> wrote:

> I know some applications are still using IGD:1, but I hope they will move
to the IGD:2.

When I was testing this nearly 4 years ago, I struggled to find CPEs with
IGD:2 support.  Hopefully the landscape has changed now that IGD:1 has been
deprecated.
But then as you say, we still need the applications to update their
behaviour and adopt the looser AddAnyPortMapping() instead of the more
specific AddPortMapping()

I'd be more confident in RFC6970 as a useful mitigation then.

-Rich

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email