IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-palet-v6ops-transition-ipv4aas discussion

Masanobu Kawashima <kawashimam@vx.jp.nec.com> Thu, 19 April 2018 13:15 UTC

Return-Path: <kawashimam@vx.jp.nec.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A8C612D7F0 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 06:15:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3rlZZ18JgvP2 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 06:15:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tyo162.gate.nec.co.jp (tyo162.gate.nec.co.jp [114.179.232.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4602127023 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 06:15:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgate02.nec.co.jp ([114.179.233.122]) by tyo162.gate.nec.co.jp (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPS id w3JDFTPX011428 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 22:15:29 +0900
Received: from mailsv02.nec.co.jp (mailgate-v.nec.co.jp [10.204.236.94]) by mailgate02.nec.co.jp (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTP id w3JDFTHD010224 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 22:15:29 +0900
Received: from mail01b.kamome.nec.co.jp (mail01b.kamome.nec.co.jp [10.25.43.2]) by mailsv02.nec.co.jp (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTP id w3JDFTVE004055 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 22:15:29 +0900
Received: from bpxc99gp.gisp.nec.co.jp ([10.38.151.150] [10.38.151.150]) by mail01b.kamome.nec.co.jp with ESMTP id BT-MMP-2526133; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 22:14:52 +0900
Received: from BPXM24GP.gisp.nec.co.jp ([10.38.151.216]) by BPXC22GP.gisp.nec.co.jp ([10.38.151.150]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 22:14:52 +0900
From: Masanobu Kawashima <kawashimam@vx.jp.nec.com>
To: V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] draft-palet-v6ops-transition-ipv4aas discussion
Thread-Index: AQHT12ZHY7UTwmMSmE2v964OwmGm+aQH8xLQ
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 13:14:51 +0000
Message-ID: <81A3232BEF82944C8F23DB1CFE276F0F495A92F4@BPXM24GP.gisp.nec.co.jp>
References: <3A083AA8-41D3-4BF8-BE31-5071975B6F98@gmail.com> <43764aef-3aef-4269-cba8-94685ee4673f@asgard.org> <29D3B2CE-C47B-4474-82F6-793122E99FF6@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <29D3B2CE-C47B-4474-82F6-793122E99FF6@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: ja-JP, en-US
Content-Language: ja-JP
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.3.141.178]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/vwkX9XRP6WNzdw7rrXHJoAYKc_I>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-palet-v6ops-transition-ipv4aas discussion
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 13:15:33 -0000

Hi, 

I support this document as a working group document. 

Our company is already providing DS-Lite and MAP-E CE router. 
However, this document will help CE router vendors as nice guideline like RFC 7084. 
I'm co-chair of IPv6 home router SWG in IPv6 promotion counsil in Japan. 
This will also help our local guideline for ISP's and CE router vendors. 

I'd also like to discuss about RFC8026 DHCPv6 S46 priority option in this document. 
Because we can't use DHCPv6 option in actual situation. 

Regards, 
Masanobu 

==================================== 
 NEC Platforms, Ltd.                 
 KAWASHIMA Masanobu                  
 kawashimam@vx.jp.nec.com            
 https://www.necplatforms.co.jp/en/  
==================================== 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: v6ops [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Fred Baker
> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2018 7:40 AM
> To: V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-palet-v6ops-transition-ipv4aas discussion
> 
> 
> 
> > On Apr 18, 2018, at 11:17 AM, Lee Howard <Lee@asgard.org> wrote:
> >
> > I think this document is needed.
> 
> So, in addition to the authors, we have three people (Richard, Barbara, and Lee) that have said to the list that this
> document "is needed", by which I infer that they want it to be adopted as a working group document. That said, as
> I said to Fred Templin a few weeks ago, that isn't proof of a consensus.
> 
> The chairs would be interested to know how many do, and how many do not, want that to happen. If you have specific
> arguments, relevance to your part of the world, and so on, that's important too.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email