IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-palet-v6ops-transition-ipv4aas discussion

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 19 April 2018 14:25 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9C90124D68 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 07:25:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IPBffqUYVdv6 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 07:25:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22e.google.com (mail-pf0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82555124B17 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 07:25:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id j5so2722422pfh.2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 07:25:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:mime-version:subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=zCAgCDtB4csygJVccdmkVdcs+1Ta7KJdWlISHQZgaWE=; b=U/OHLZfXUZOoO4szHFdtLVgaeVLMCxBZSQRQB+4gQuOmR4EDOkr5tOHrcvFU7BOSw6 GH6oaExbCMEF5YHvG1M/Q9OK1TK3cjHEWee2b/WoAGvng2l2CPscuTrlPKvInmDR9qbT /XKhT6wo+EmaF+/Qs9k1/ZkU4vPhKuBjBQKKvkBRb22GbwyKi+TpDaf03n6caqO8vEkv bUMfVU1cJQd0dgtpVPSzqWei5Xs/SytXCiPDnMA+Fnklgr4tJm1o8rXA126z08o6F7H3 be/l/1L/acgDMT0I34IF1Pm803+gI4SDXW5VnXRcpDtq+6x/bKzu08A9Axz9svGXLDtY cxcA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:date:references:to :in-reply-to:message-id; bh=zCAgCDtB4csygJVccdmkVdcs+1Ta7KJdWlISHQZgaWE=; b=rWozVNfXhCFYKNalcGZavpqkeOMfoz25jSbHN2islEX0P50+Zhqx4VkisDBNSWQvJ3 PLLULrk+PBC3Dhp4Qmmg8sXFJHo9o5gfng8ShbqhbX76QqL3Zz0UG4y/IqgzYRC47yM5 UmtLhWNDs/boUmRgxM8Yq4TV4d173j7NJLf6suNpd4iFUS80XeIoPIyiZroa7RhL9bDH IUR7Hl8V4zcFvN9Aot0okA70Zsjjw2qoOJamlwXiEj6ejapWCJITMfsisTWTuCENcRsy GVWeqA0XfN58jqahtx5Bnl5A8NP0htHNnGNu7YGHkBFhW0sXVuH2AgqRvUdegpBq3b2S DtjQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tB2pXik+p0wqrCzouv4CFLm53i4T3x1KzgfPznxtJwIMewKGx3M wFgToB+nnEF5M1EXFxYRTMHqyRrF
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+0UIirjXQxEpB2pwmlAUlDYiU7qxYUkdt3HqgBceiaflOsdvGnCj11nXw6dYQ2qWYDJYDZ2A==
X-Received: by 10.99.124.20 with SMTP id x20mr5390534pgc.161.1524147913828; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 07:25:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.58.211.1] (96-95-216-129-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [96.95.216.129]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c28sm8996494pfe.27.2018.04.19.07.25.12 for <v6ops@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 19 Apr 2018 07:25:12 -0700 (PDT)
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9BE6690F-034D-40AD-B939-0A08BC4B7D93"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.3 \(3445.6.18\))
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 07:25:10 -0700
References: <3A083AA8-41D3-4BF8-BE31-5071975B6F98@gmail.com> <43764aef-3aef-4269-cba8-94685ee4673f@asgard.org> <29D3B2CE-C47B-4474-82F6-793122E99FF6@gmail.com>
To: V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <29D3B2CE-C47B-4474-82F6-793122E99FF6@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <A26BCB67-8C61-41E9-B57F-F4899389B824@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.6.18)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/NTeqtjrdzMjvu6Ug7EW6GnR27ws>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-palet-v6ops-transition-ipv4aas discussion
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 14:25:16 -0000

On Apr 18, 2018, at 3:40 PM, Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> The chairs would be interested to know how many do, and how many do not, want that to happen. If you have specific arguments, relevance to your part of the world, and so on, that's important too.

So using all of my fingers and thumbs, Ron and I see a vendor and seven operators that want to see this as a working group document; we see enough of a consensus in that regard. During May, we invite Jordi to repost as draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-ipv4aas, a working group document. I obviously expect Jordi to work with the operators that commented on the requirements, and to discuss it at IETF 102. In my dreams, I'd like to reach consensus then on the features in question.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email