IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-palet-v6ops-transition-ipv4aas discussion

Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> Thu, 19 April 2018 06:48 UTC

Return-Path: <sander@steffann.nl>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A60B129C70 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 23:48:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=steffann.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w00nKSELwcG9 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 23:48:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sintact.nl (mail.sintact.nl [IPv6:2001:9e0:803::6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 674D712AAB6 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 23:48:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BDE04A; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 08:48:06 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=steffann.nl; h= references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:date:date :in-reply-to:x-mailer:from:from:subject:subject:mime-version :content-type:content-type:received:received; s=mail; t= 1524120484; bh=vgnL0ZT+7DZxn+40jFoWOWgAvd4HtutGgty+rXRr67I=; b=M JtoIghkLZ4P6Xxu6iesowozbNk2u88AMu++mTV7caIzD2nK5hFP3CsYzKiTExc7a OtalmYaNluFcYRG13HkcpxCF8fHHLcmn6LobkWqcbinKEIhK99UEFePguriL2tPY sBOUm3b6XEDD0GRyKb794YXkQxggSeDKC8KCPh8RiU=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.sintact.nl
Received: from mail.sintact.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.sintact.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id ds57wq-g9TiX; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 08:48:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [IPv6:2a02:a213:a301:1000:94cc:a164:f546:a94e] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:a213:a301:1000:94cc:a164:f546:a94e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B696F49; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 08:48:04 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
From: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (15E216)
In-Reply-To: <29D3B2CE-C47B-4474-82F6-793122E99FF6@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 08:48:02 +0200
Cc: V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E6DB7D1C-A2BA-4D16-AA6C-7FC6D84BAC37@steffann.nl>
References: <3A083AA8-41D3-4BF8-BE31-5071975B6F98@gmail.com> <43764aef-3aef-4269-cba8-94685ee4673f@asgard.org> <29D3B2CE-C47B-4474-82F6-793122E99FF6@gmail.com>
To: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/owNpR1GkGryhIuACyPXG3r3IEHM>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-palet-v6ops-transition-ipv4aas discussion
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 06:48:13 -0000

Hi,

> So, in addition to the authors, we have three people (Richard, Barbara, and Lee) that have said to the list that this document "is needed", by which I infer that they want it to be adopted as a working group document. That said, as I said to Fred Templin a few weeks ago, that isn't proof of a consensus.
> 
> The chairs would be interested to know how many do, and how many do not, want that to happen. If you have specific arguments, relevance to your part of the world, and so on, that's important too.

I would like to see this draft adopted as a working group document. I recognise Hans' arguments from my discussions with other vendors.

Cheers,
Sander

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email