IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [woes] Proposed charter, post-Quebec edition

Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> Thu, 04 August 2011 12:52 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: woes@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: woes@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD6BF21F8BBA for <woes@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 05:52:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.492
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.492 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.106, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eWcjIOUWCm3t for <woes@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 05:52:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gw0-f44.google.com (mail-gw0-f44.google.com [74.125.83.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0073121F8B8D for <woes@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 05:52:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gwb20 with SMTP id 20so1174477gwb.31 for <woes@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 05:52:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=iMiBFVLYBt3slzXfHtsgkQ4xe6fKr2oX8cEO+B2ZSOU=; b=PJtEYxk76SXaXQtxkmIo51i4jGlU2RjTEEdjTXv3XLttPKEpdgsiRbajvj0eJNd7BE xMqWUyMjOrZnQaZC++snRtwp09vG0s/SBzYH+6cBlabrxs3JpCwPC7fX36XxvU3HLwHX hqYBQH4pUgtSu24DkUUlmJzKG0aLqmTOnfQDs=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.254.3 with SMTP id b3mr660437ani.116.1312462368255; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 05:52:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.100.34.3 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 05:52:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8499B724-BC3D-4124-B8B2-B1FF762020E3@ve7jtb.com>
References: <4F25253E-A870-4956-AAB1-20890B655984@vpnc.org> <DADD7EAD88AB484D8CCC328D40214CCD0E743D3330@EXPO10.exchange.mit.edu> <4E39B44C.1070706@stpeter.im> <4E39B483.7080101@stpeter.im> <8499B724-BC3D-4124-B8B2-B1FF762020E3@ve7jtb.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 08:52:48 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMm+LwgyJsQEm8Jm=UDQf-e9EOu-P78PoKtEB8VmvRcBE_OpeA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
To: John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00163691ff513dad7004a9ad75e5"
Cc: "woes@ietf.org" <woes@ietf.org>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Subject: Re: [woes] Proposed charter, post-Quebec edition
X-BeenThere: woes@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Web Object Encryption and Signing \(woes\) BOF discussion list" <woes.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/woes>, <mailto:woes-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/woes>
List-Post: <mailto:woes@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:woes-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/woes>, <mailto:woes-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 12:52:34 -0000

On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 8:39 AM, John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com> wrote:

> Yes I was getting some grief from one of the large venders about openID
> Connect being based on JSON because it is not a standard like XML.
>
> They were just being general prats about IPR things.
>

This might be the reason for the concern:

http://www.virginiaiplaw.com/2011/03/articles/patent-litigation/judge-brinkema-grants-summary-judgment-to-defendants-in-tecsec-v-ibm-patent-case/


I can't go into the details of the case as I was a defense expert for
another defendant.

-- 
Website: http://hallambaker.com/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email