IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [woes] Proposed charter, post-Quebec edition

Matt Miller <mamille2@cisco.com> Wed, 03 August 2011 20:35 UTC

Return-Path: <mamille2@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: woes@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: woes@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9BAC5E8001 for <woes@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 13:35:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.17
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.17 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.571, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4FobLMHiuP91 for <woes@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 13:35:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 268F622800D for <woes@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 13:35:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=mamille2@cisco.com; l=3795; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1312403742; x=1313613342; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id: references:to; bh=t1qCWjtAmyOvYuZn8rnUYiLmp+6eASHy3AJkuJlaji0=; b=a/Xd6n15k1ItyHwUlWk1W6HB7xVpm/6B03nQOxElwodwGRrWUe3Y62Jz s0uqA5PRSiaNbr2iQZ0w/Cu2qao7KQ7INgPe6cPoJqjQc0ajMku0AEdbO 0xCUDkP1aIiBRr60cmronkUUxZVrZfQaUgrhvjbPlCnfyFBVveiAfisBh o=;
X-Files: smime.p7s : 2214
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAJSwOU6tJXG8/2dsb2JhbABCDqdTd4FAAQEBAQIBEgFmBQsLRgJVBhMih0qiOQGeaYVjXwSHWoshkC1W
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.67,312,1309737600"; d="p7s'?scan'208"; a="9404050"
Received: from rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com ([173.37.113.188]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 03 Aug 2011 20:35:40 +0000
Received: from dhcp-64-101-72-212.cisco.com (dhcp-64-101-72-212.cisco.com [64.101.72.212]) by rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p73KZdVN029101; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 20:35:39 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail-10--910906460"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
From: Matt Miller <mamille2@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <DADD7EAD88AB484D8CCC328D40214CCD0E743D3330@EXPO10.exchange.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 14:35:42 -0600
Message-Id: <5E1150D8-EF17-495C-BD48-965678026FB4@cisco.com>
References: <4F25253E-A870-4956-AAB1-20890B655984@vpnc.org> <DADD7EAD88AB484D8CCC328D40214CCD0E743D3330@EXPO10.exchange.mit.edu>
To: Thomas Hardjono <hardjono@MIT.EDU>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: "woes@ietf.org" <woes@ietf.org>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Subject: Re: [woes] Proposed charter, post-Quebec edition
X-BeenThere: woes@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Web Object Encryption and Signing \(woes\) BOF discussion list" <woes.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/woes>, <mailto:woes-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/woes>
List-Post: <mailto:woes@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:woes-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/woes>, <mailto:woes-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 20:35:29 -0000

On Aug 3, 2011, at 14:33, Thomas Hardjono wrote:

> Paul,
> 
> Looks good.
> 
> Just my clarification, looking at 1) and 2) does it mean that the
> resulting JOSE WG specifications can be applied to non-JSON data
> structures? (I'm ok with this).

Yes; at least one of the desired uses is to sign/encrypt XMPP stanzas! (-:


- m&m

Matt Miller - <mamille2@cisco.com>
Collaboration Software Group - Cisco Systems, Inc.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email