Re: [woes] Proposed charter, post-Quebec edition

["Paul C. Bryan" <[e-mail]>]

On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 14:35 -0600, Matt Miller wrote:

> On Aug 3, 2011, at 14:33, Thomas Hardjono wrote:
> 
> > Paul,
> > 
> > Looks good.
> > 
> > Just my clarification, looking at 1) and 2) does it mean that the
> > resulting JOSE WG specifications can be applied to non-JSON data
> > structures? (I'm ok with this).
> 
> Yes; at least one of the desired uses is to sign/encrypt XMPP stanzas! (-:



For my edification, why would JOSE want to concern itself with
representations of other media types, rather than allowing other
transformations to deal with this?

Put another way, if there were a method of encapsulating and encoding
non-JSON media types in a JSON structure, would JOSE seek to reinvent
such a thing, or merely defer to using it?

Paul