Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Thu, 31 July 2008 10:02 UTC

Return-Path: <72attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 72attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-72attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E8003A69EB; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:02:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: 72attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 72attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B447C3A696C for <72attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:02:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.491
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.491 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.108, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7krn+3zq2WZR for <72attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:02:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (mail.mipassoc.org [IPv6:2001:470:1:76:0:ffff:4834:7146]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 514373A680A for <72attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:02:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.17.5.63] ([130.129.65.35]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6VA2hde014665 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:02:45 -0700
Message-ID: <48918DC4.3080708@dcrocker.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:02:44 +0100
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dale Worley <dworley@pingtel.com>
References: <1217498154.21037.20.camel@victoria.pingtel.com>
In-Reply-To: <1217498154.21037.20.camel@victoria.pingtel.com>
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92/7898/Wed Jul 30 23:42:41 2008 on sbh17.songbird.com
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:02:46 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: 72attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions
X-BeenThere: 72attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 72 meeting." <72attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees>, <mailto:72attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/72attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:72attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:72attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees>, <mailto:72attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: 72attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 72attendees-bounces@ietf.org


Dale Worley wrote:
> If we use venues used to international conferences and pay full freight,
> the chefs understand and will deal with all sorts of dietary
> restrictions.  But that costs money, people are already objecting to
> costs, and full-freight prices and globalized venues work directly
> against our goal of being accessible to an international audience.


What is the basis for you claim that such venues are more expensive than other 
venues we go to.  (For example, can you list some of each type that the IETF has 
been to?)

d/
-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
72attendees mailing list
72attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees