Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions
Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Thu, 31 July 2008 10:02 UTC
Return-Path: <72attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 72attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-72attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E8003A69EB; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:02:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: 72attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 72attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B447C3A696C for <72attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:02:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.491
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.491 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.108, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7krn+3zq2WZR for <72attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:02:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (mail.mipassoc.org [IPv6:2001:470:1:76:0:ffff:4834:7146]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 514373A680A for <72attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:02:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.17.5.63] ([130.129.65.35]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6VA2hde014665 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:02:45 -0700
Message-ID: <48918DC4.3080708@dcrocker.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:02:44 +0100
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dale Worley <dworley@pingtel.com>
References: <1217498154.21037.20.camel@victoria.pingtel.com>
In-Reply-To: <1217498154.21037.20.camel@victoria.pingtel.com>
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92/7898/Wed Jul 30 23:42:41 2008 on sbh17.songbird.com
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:02:46 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: 72attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions
X-BeenThere: 72attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 72 meeting." <72attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees>, <mailto:72attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/72attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:72attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:72attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees>, <mailto:72attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: 72attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 72attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Dale Worley wrote: > If we use venues used to international conferences and pay full freight, > the chefs understand and will deal with all sorts of dietary > restrictions. But that costs money, people are already objecting to > costs, and full-freight prices and globalized venues work directly > against our goal of being accessible to an international audience. What is the basis for you claim that such venues are more expensive than other venues we go to. (For example, can you list some of each type that the IETF has been to?) d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ 72attendees mailing list 72attendees@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees
- [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Dale Worley
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Dave Crocker
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Yoav Nir
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Mary Barnes
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Dale Worley
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Dale Worley
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Mary Barnes
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Soininen Jonne (NSN FI/Espoo)
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Mary Barnes
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Mary Barnes
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Dan Wing
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Mary Barnes
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Even, Roni
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Randall Gellens
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Ted Lemon
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions John C Klensin
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions john+ietf
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions john+ietf