IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions

"Spencer Dawkins" <spencer@wonderhamster.org> Thu, 31 July 2008 14:21 UTC

Return-Path: <72attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 72attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-72attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDB363A6923; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:21:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: 72attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 72attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 687793A6923 for <72attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:21:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.824
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.824 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.825, BAYES_50=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jy3DaYCWEdap for <72attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:21:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.196]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F7473A6834 for <72attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:21:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from s73602 ([130.129.23.81]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus1) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MKpCa-1KOYvc2xYS-0004Q0; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:14:54 -0400
Message-ID: <05d101c8f317$e8ba25d0$51178182@china.huawei.com>
From: Spencer Dawkins <spencer@wonderhamster.org>
To: 72attendees@ietf.org
References: <C4B78D93.77300%jonne.soininen@nsn.com><90A684D2-AD5F-4116-B03C-F74287BD4492@cs.columbia.edu><4891C091.3030307@bogus.com><F66D7286825402429571678A16C2F5EE04A52F45@zrc2hxm1.corp.nortel.com> <4891C548.3000302@bogus.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:15:36 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+ASrHPBUfzAvb8DOEMWIGW+FxWxP6AMy6TFBJ BaI38EWuo3M8b1fbsPTTDFL6ga3fpAtiujlOa7LLOb+JFUv9Z2 1qK8oEQl87gpTowLIDmQCsCvT3JVwnkU5w7Vn2Mco0=
Subject: Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions
X-BeenThere: 72attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 72 meeting." <72attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees>, <mailto:72attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/72attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:72attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:72attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees>, <mailto:72attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: 72attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 72attendees-bounces@ietf.org

I saw a spectacularly helpful note from Jonne (and Mary thought it was the 
right answer) suggesting that the people who are affected work together to 
figure out what needs to happen.

Let's wait for at least one IETF cycle and see if this is sufficient, and 
then reopen the thread if it's not.

OK?

Spencer 


_______________________________________________
72attendees mailing list
72attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email