[72attendees] Dietary restrictions
Dale Worley <dworley@pingtel.com> Thu, 31 July 2008 09:56 UTC
Return-Path: <72attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 72attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-72attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DBA628C0E1; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 02:56:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: 72attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 72attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 945793A6C4B for <72attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 02:56:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.87
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.87 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KAkwr604T2Dv for <72attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 02:56:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pingtel.com (host117.155.212.198.conversent.net [155.212.198.117]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 615043A6B11 for <72attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 02:56:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ssh.pingtel.com [10.1.20.8]) by mail.pingtel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C976C01D for <72attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 05:55:55 -0400 (EDT)
From: Dale Worley <dworley@pingtel.com>
To: 72attendees@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 05:55:54 -0400
Message-Id: <1217498154.21037.20.camel@victoria.pingtel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 (2.12.3-5.fc8)
Subject: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions
X-BeenThere: 72attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 72 meeting." <72attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees>, <mailto:72attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/72attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:72attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:72attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees>, <mailto:72attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: 72attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 72attendees-bounces@ietf.org
The problem with dietary restrictions is that there is a collision of design goals. If we use venues used to international conferences and pay full freight, the chefs understand and will deal with all sorts of dietary restrictions. But that costs money, people are already objecting to costs, and full-freight prices and globalized venues work directly against our goal of being accessible to an international audience. An effective, if unsympathetic, approach would be to have people with dietary restrictions be responsible for finding their own solutions. But people who are volunteers may well not have enough time to deal with finding specialized food sources. Ideally, food passes through the hands of chefs who can cope with dietary restrictions. But we don't really want to require sit-down restaurant prices, we want mass-provisioned food prices. But we want individual customization also. Worse, once we get beyond established international conference venues, it may be hard to get particular dietary restrictions even understood. E.g., it seems that about 0.03% of the Irish population is Jewish, and though I'd expect a food service operation to have some idea that kosher food exists, it's probably hard to obtain. And though celiac disease is not new, I don't believe that it was recognized until recently, and I wouldn't be surprised if there are significant parts of the world where it is not yet understood as a dietary problem. Dale _______________________________________________ 72attendees mailing list 72attendees@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees
- [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Dale Worley
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Dave Crocker
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Yoav Nir
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Mary Barnes
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Dale Worley
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Dale Worley
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Mary Barnes
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Soininen Jonne (NSN FI/Espoo)
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Mary Barnes
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Mary Barnes
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Dan Wing
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Mary Barnes
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Even, Roni
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Randall Gellens
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Ted Lemon
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions John C Klensin
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions john+ietf
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions john+ietf