Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions

"Mary Barnes" <mary.barnes@nortel.com> Thu, 31 July 2008 14:41 UTC

Return-Path: <72attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 72attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-72attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 089B03A6C77; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:41:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: 72attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 72attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E9863A6839 for <72attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:41:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.503
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.503 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.096, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pUEXwRnD1neN for <72attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:41:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zrtps0kn.nortel.com (zrtps0kn.nortel.com [47.140.192.55]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DACF83A6C77 for <72attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:41:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zrc2hxm1.corp.nortel.com (zrc2hxm1.corp.nortel.com [47.103.123.72]) by zrtps0kn.nortel.com (Switch-2.2.6/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id m6VEbi521568; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:37:44 GMT
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:34:56 -0500
Message-ID: <F66D7286825402429571678A16C2F5EE04A53092@zrc2hxm1.corp.nortel.com>
In-Reply-To: <05d101c8f317$e8ba25d0$51178182@china.huawei.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions
Thread-Index: AcjzGMBD1XgKUMDcQKSYhuw7fLOjiAAALhOg
References: <C4B78D93.77300%jonne.soininen@nsn.com><90A684D2-AD5F-4116-B03C-F74287BD4492@cs.columbia.edu><4891C091.3030307@bogus.com><F66D7286825402429571678A16C2F5EE04A52F45@zrc2hxm1.corp.nortel.com> <4891C548.3000302@bogus.com> <05d101c8f317$e8ba25d0$51178182@china.huawei.com>
From: Mary Barnes <mary.barnes@nortel.com>
To: Spencer Dawkins <spencer@wonderhamster.org>, 72attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions
X-BeenThere: 72attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 72 meeting." <72attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees>, <mailto:72attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/72attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:72attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:72attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees>, <mailto:72attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: 72attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 72attendees-bounces@ietf.org

I've gone ahead and setup a doodle to determine the number of folks
impacted and the sorts of things that are restricted:
http://www.doodle.ch/yih8zhd2k9mxys6b

I do plan on renting a car when I arrive in Minneapolis to get my food
for the week and I'll be shopping on Sat. (time TBD) at Whole Foods. If
you're interested in going with me, let me know (FCFS) offline. In
addition, if folks have a few items they'd like me to pick up for them,
I'd be happy to do so. I will send just a single reminder on this topic
when the IETF-73 list is setup, as I do realize for a number of you all,
this discussion is just annoying. 

Also, if folks could contact me offline, I'm happy to coordinate setting
up some other form of communication for us. 

Regards,
Mary.

-----Original Message-----
From: 72attendees-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:72attendees-bounces@ietf.org]
On Behalf Of Spencer Dawkins
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 9:16 AM
To: 72attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [72attendees] Dietary restrictions

I saw a spectacularly helpful note from Jonne (and Mary thought it was
the right answer) suggesting that the people who are affected work
together to figure out what needs to happen.

Let's wait for at least one IETF cycle and see if this is sufficient,
and then reopen the thread if it's not.

OK?

Spencer 


_______________________________________________
72attendees mailing list
72attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees
_______________________________________________
72attendees mailing list
72attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees