Re: [apps-discuss] Encouraging third party registrations
Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Tue, 15 November 2011 04:14 UTC
Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8752E21F8D9A for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:14:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.585
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.585 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.041, BAYES_00=-2.599, FRT_ADOBE2=2.455, J_CHICKENPOX_24=0.6, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l4ePmBqGFDD1 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:14:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E164121F8D89 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:14:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-15ab.meeting.ietf.org (unknown [64.104.46.217]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A83624216E; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 21:20:17 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <4EC1E70A.7030909@stpeter.im>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 12:14:02 +0800
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
References: <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D0611DABF22@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com> <4EC0BE9E.8020702@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <01O8ETBP3QY400RCTX@mauve.mrochek.com> <4EC1C3D7.7070402@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <4EC1CAC9.7000301@isode.com> <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D0611DAC11F@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com> <CAK3OfOhcLOv881KUghAq-tq+H7DASpW=9zveQSFLw8QH5-OU0w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAK3OfOhcLOv881KUghAq-tq+H7DASpW=9zveQSFLw8QH5-OU0w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Roy Fielding <fielding@adobe.com>, Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>, "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Encouraging third party registrations
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 04:14:07 -0000
On 11/15/11 11:00 AM, Nico Williams wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Larry Masinter<masinter@adobe.com> wrote: >> Who should a third-party registrar list as the "change controller" ? > > If collisions don't matter then who cares? Just add more collisions :) > > Alternatively, how about: > > A third party should not claim to be the owner. > The third party could specify an owner, but that should be considered > informative. > Anyone could make a claim on a registration that has no owner already. > Anyone claiming to be the owner of a registration that already has an > owner would have to submit their claim to<fill in the blank> (IESG?), > with appeals going to<fill in the blank> (IAB?). > > But I think it's better to just not have to have an owner, nor any > change control -- it's easier and cheaper that way, particularly if it > is true that collisions in this namespace are of little consequence. I think I might buy into that. So the change controller and owner is IANA, right? Do we expect that IANA would keep track of who has asked it to register or modify any given entry? Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
- [apps-discuss] A modest proposal for MIME types (… Larry Masinter
- Re: [apps-discuss] A modest proposal for MIME typ… Frank Ellermann
- Re: [apps-discuss] A modest proposal for MIME typ… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [apps-discuss] A modest proposal for MIME typ… Graham Klyne
- Re: [apps-discuss] A modest proposal for MIME typ… Nathaniel Borenstein
- Re: [apps-discuss] A modest proposal for MIME typ… Nico Williams
- Re: [apps-discuss] A modest proposal for MIME typ… Nico Williams
- Re: [apps-discuss] A modest proposal for MIME typ… Frank Ellermann
- Re: [apps-discuss] A modest proposal for MIME typ… Ned Freed
- Re: [apps-discuss] A modest proposal for MIME typ… Ned Freed
- Re: [apps-discuss] A modest proposal for MIME typ… Nico Williams
- Re: [apps-discuss] A modest proposal for MIME typ… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [apps-discuss] A modest proposal for MIME typ… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [apps-discuss] A modest proposal for MIME typ… Ned Freed
- [apps-discuss] Encouraging third party registrati… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [apps-discuss] A modest proposal for MIME typ… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [apps-discuss] Encouraging third party regist… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [apps-discuss] Encouraging third party regist… Larry Masinter
- Re: [apps-discuss] Encouraging third party regist… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [apps-discuss] Encouraging third party regist… Nico Williams
- Re: [apps-discuss] Encouraging third party regist… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [apps-discuss] Encouraging third party regist… Nico Williams
- Re: [apps-discuss] Encouraging third party regist… Ned Freed
- Re: [apps-discuss] Encouraging third party regist… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [apps-discuss] A modest proposal for MIME typ… Ned Freed
- Re: [apps-discuss] Encouraging third party regist… Ned Freed
- Re: [apps-discuss] Encouraging third party regist… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [apps-discuss] A modest proposal for MIME typ… Graham Klyne
- Re: [apps-discuss] Encouraging third party regist… Graham Klyne
- Re: [apps-discuss] Encouraging third party regist… Graham Klyne
- Re: [apps-discuss] A modest proposal for MIME typ… t.petch
- Re: [apps-discuss] Encouraging third party regist… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [apps-discuss] Encouraging third party regist… Ned Freed