Re: [arch-d] FYI: "ISOC" "New IP" "discussion" "paper"
John Grant <j@ninetiles.com> Thu, 30 April 2020 14:53 UTC
Return-Path: <j@ninetiles.com>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DFD83A0A8F for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 07:53:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.717
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.717 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.82, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZWTUbBBpu2VE for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 07:53:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from know-smtprelay-omc-6.server.virginmedia.net (know-smtprelay-omc-6.server.virginmedia.net [80.0.253.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 445833A0A85 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 07:53:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.35] ([79.72.166.100]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPA id UAYtjDczWEIzOUAYujBDii; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 15:53:16 +0100
X-Originating-IP: [79.72.166.100]
X-Authenticated-User: john.s.grant@ntlworld.com
X-Spam: 0
X-Authority: v=2.3 cv=HZs6sBM8 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=KdT9lSvhpbvUFdjzdD3cHA==:117 a=KdT9lSvhpbvUFdjzdD3cHA==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=-O5YPv7yAAAA:8 a=le6d79QuAAAA:8 a=W4KLshwA3pVDENfDSAYA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=E1MJKltkMhAA:10 a=TLqBRRHTddABEfEY9lce:22 a=QbAMNLWdp4a7deKPGBBn:22
To: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
References: <20200428190608.GN62020@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <d85b5fbc-0379-602d-7c9b-fabfd9cdac58@gmail.com> <20200428211737.GP62020@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <emde06c4fa-b2c1-418c-9f5d-50e5a28bbe6c@desktop-rub0n2r> <20200428222219.GQ62020@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <LO2P265MB0573C465963C5C75436952FEC2AA0@LO2P265MB0573.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
From: John Grant <j@ninetiles.com>
Message-ID: <436ee034-c792-167b-332c-accfa0397835@ninetiles.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 15:53:13 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <LO2P265MB0573C465963C5C75436952FEC2AA0@LO2P265MB0573.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-GB
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfNqtC59Xqfr18PEgGiA96JgmpU5BX3y8KxKIibjb0loXbusITg2j0A+Im7jpjCfM+rpJXLHP8qyibiCF4FCXVeKG4XWRY5uVimT32uvYd5zCCx/0N0+R xRdL9uARZbo0qknlX/CAqCvFi/TLaW/5cvHFF/2qbt7j2KFnJXGEjtXl51+C4ZW8JFgMtuMZ6bSOaw==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/B_8APA2SmUKAusBDyVN5wYA2BCk>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] FYI: "ISOC" "New IP" "discussion" "paper"
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 14:53:21 -0000
On 30/04/2020 14:49, Andrew Campling wrote: > I note that there has been some pushback about the ITU looking at this, however it's not clear to me that anyone else is looking seriously at longer-term development like this so it appears to have left a vacuum. I could of course be mistaken in that, look forward to being corrected as appropriate. Well, there is ETSI ISG NIN (see thread about 2 weeks ago). See https://www.etsi.org/technologies/non-ip-networking and sign up at https://portal.etsi.org/tb.aspx?tbid=887#/ -- John Grant Nine Tiles, Cambridge, England +44 1223 862599 and +44 1223 511455 http://www.ninetiles.com
- [arch-d] FYI: "ISOC" "New IP" "discussion" "paper" Toerless Eckert
- Re: [arch-d] FYI: "ISOC" "New IP" "discussion" "p… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [arch-d] FYI: "ISOC" "New IP" "discussion" "p… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [arch-d] FYI: "ISOC" "New IP" "discussion" "p… Ian Peter
- Re: [arch-d] FYI: "ISOC" "New IP" "discussion" "p… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [arch-d] FYI: "ISOC" "New IP" "discussion" "p… John Levine
- Re: [arch-d] FYI: "ISOC" "New IP" "discussion" "p… Olaf Kolkman
- Re: [arch-d] FYI: "ISOC" "New IP" "discussion" "p… Olaf Kolkman
- Re: [arch-d] FYI: "ISOC" "New IP" "discussion" "p… Andrew Campling
- Re: [arch-d] FYI: "ISOC" "New IP" "discussion" "p… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [arch-d] FYI: "ISOC" "New IP" "discussion" "p… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [arch-d] FYI: "ISOC" "New IP" "discussion" "p… John Grant
- Re: [arch-d] FYI: "ISOC" "New IP" "discussion" "p… Andrew Campling
- Re: [arch-d] FYI: "ISOC" "New IP" "discussion" "p… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [arch-d] FYI: "ISOC" "New IP" "discussion" "p… John Grant
- Re: [arch-d] FYI: "ISOC" "New IP" "discussion" "p… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [arch-d] FYI: "ISOC" "New IP" "discussion" "p… Guntur Wiseno Putra
- Re: [arch-d] FYI: "ISOC" "New IP" "discussion" "p… Andrew Sullivan