IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: L-Root address change [Re: [DNSOP] AS112 for TLDs]

bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com Wed, 28 November 2007 16:23 UTC

Return-path: <dnsop-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IxPhT-0005Uj-Sj; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:23:47 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IxPhS-0005UU-6K for dnsop@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:23:46 -0500
Received: from vacation.karoshi.com ([198.32.6.68]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IxPhP-0008Mc-Ro for dnsop@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:23:46 -0500
Received: from karoshi.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by vacation.karoshi.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id lASGMfsG006715; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:22:41 GMT
Received: (from bmanning@localhost) by karoshi.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id lASGMfqg006714; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:22:41 GMT
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:22:41 +0000
From: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
To: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>, bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com, Matt Larson <mlarson@verisign.com>, Peter Koch <pk@DENIC.DE>, IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: L-Root address change [Re: [DNSOP] AS112 for TLDs]
Message-ID: <20071128162241.GC6551@vacation.karoshi.com.>
References: <474C40DF.8080100@publicroot.org> <9B9F9C57-5000-4A63-99CA-89EEB8014205@icann.org> <474C9497.7020308@publicroot.org> <CDFBEFF8-B4BD-4D2B-8E86-6919B62DBA14@icann.org> <474C9A04.1090405@publicroot.org> <77E55800-E184-4225-91C5-59DA85D3E156@icann.org> <20071128095544.GB19314@unknown.office.denic.de> <20071128155817.GE494@dul1mcmlarson-l1.verisignlabs.com> <20071128160759.GA6551@vacation.karoshi.com.> <20071128161559.GB11779@outpost.ds9a.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20071128161559.GB11779@outpost.ds9a.nl>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----)
X-Scan-Signature: d6b246023072368de71562c0ab503126
Cc:
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dnsop-bounces@ietf.org

On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 05:15:59PM +0100, bert hubert wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 04:07:59PM +0000, bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
> > 	and perhaps more interesting, the old address for "B"
> > 	showed a tapering off of traffic and then an INCREASE
> > 	last year.   Old L and J got their numbers less than a
> > 	decade ago.  ...  so i would not go back as far as the
> > 	begining of the Internet.  Old B has been around for quite
> > 	a while longer.
> 
> The increase in traffic might easily be due to more favourable connectivity
> to 'B', which would lead many resolver implementations to shift more queries
> to it.
> 
> 	Bert
> 

	old "B" topolgy didnt change... :)

--bill

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email