IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] AS112 for TLDs

"William F. Maton Sotomayor" <wmaton@ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca> Tue, 01 April 2008 18:38 UTC

Return-Path: <dnsop-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsop-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DF0D28C2E1; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 11:38:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 845DA3A6892 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 11:38:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yk-bzO-bCLe6 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 11:38:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca (ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca [IPv6:2001:410:9000:127::10]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E8A728C4C3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 11:38:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m31Ic70U008620 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 1 Apr 2008 14:38:12 -0400
Received: from localhost (wmaton@localhost) by ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m31Ic7vl008617; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 14:38:07 -0400
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:38:07 -0400
From: "William F. Maton Sotomayor" <wmaton@ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca>
To: Sebastian Castro <secastro@nic.cl>
In-Reply-To: <20080401182319.GA16269@nicolette.nic.cl>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0804011435200.6742@ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca>
References: <20071127141848.GA16571@nic.fr> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0712031339450.13550@ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca> <47546DB3.1040907@ca.afilias.info> <a0624080cc37ba1875cf0@[130.129.67.81]> <47F2726E.6060906@nic.cl> <a06240801c41825409ca1@[10.31.68.58]> <20080401182319.GA16269@nicolette.nic.cl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org, Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] AS112 for TLDs
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: wmaton@ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dnsop-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsop-bounces@ietf.org

On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, Sebastian Castro wrote:

> So the data seems to be useful (but not complete). Once we got all the
> data for DITL 2008 we could try to run the same test and look for
> trends.

But it is a good start in having a look at the problem (or if anyone could 
consider to be a problem).

I suppose I should dust off my notes on this issue and hammer something 
out, as there were some on this list who were interested in seeing a 
proposal.  Mind you, I wonder if the WG might be out of scope for dealing 
with 'junk' TLD.

wfms
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email