Re: [DNSOP] AS112 for TLDs

[Phil Regnauld <[e-mail]>]

William F. Maton Sotomayor (wmaton) writes:
> 
>  I think it very may well be suited to that task, but are we crossing a line 
>  here that may result down a path we might regret later on.  I think what 
>  would need to be worked out is what criteria would be used to declare a 
>  local or nonsense domain, nonsense or junk, and have that suitably delegated 
>  to AS112.  It could go ad infinitum (ever word in every language), or it 
>  could be we need to take whatever floats to the top 25 of a domain lookup 
>  chart.  Of course, someone needs to determine what makes a good sample to 
>  create that statistic.

	The first step is to decide whether delegating to AS112 is reserved
	to standardized (read: RFC) zones, like RFC1918, 169.254, etc..., or
	whether anything sufficiently large -- and bogus -- is sufficient.

	.local fits the latter criteria.  But yes, it does make the requirement
	criteria more fuzzy.

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop