IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Re: L-Root address change (Was: AS112 for TLDs

Ralf Weber <denic@eng.colt.net> Wed, 28 November 2007 11:41 UTC

Return-path: <dnsop-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IxLIX-0007cT-54; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 06:41:45 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IxLIV-0007aj-LB for dnsop@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 06:41:43 -0500
Received: from smtp.lon.server.colt.net ([212.74.77.49] helo=smtp.lon.dcn.colt.net) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IxLIU-0000xA-21 for dnsop@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 06:41:43 -0500
Received: from ritterrost.fra.ws.COLT.NET (quo.fra.dcn.colt.net [10.249.6.129]) by smtp.lon.dcn.colt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 461E560F09; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:41:41 +0100 (CET)
Message-Id: <5EE1DB69-7D12-4CF5-9B0D-08650D048EFA@eng.colt.net>
From: Ralf Weber <denic@eng.colt.net>
To: IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <20071128101202.GA24731@nic.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Re: L-Root address change (Was: AS112 for TLDs
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915)
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:41:40 +0100
References: <20071127141848.GA16571@nic.fr> <20071127150813.GD33734@moof.catpipe.net> <474C40DF.8080100@publicroot.org> <9B9F9C57-5000-4A63-99CA-89EEB8014205@icann.org> <474C9497.7020308@publicroot.org> <CDFBEFF8-B4BD-4D2B-8E86-6919B62DBA14@icann.org> <474C9A04.1090405@publicroot.org> <77E55800-E184-4225-91C5-59DA85D3E156@icann.org> <20071128095544.GB19314@unknown.office.denic.de> <20071128101202.GA24731@nic.fr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.915)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7655788c23eb79e336f5f8ba8bce7906
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dnsop-bounces@ietf.org

Moin!


On Nov 28, 2007, at 11:12 , Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 10:55:44AM +0100,
> Peter Koch <pk@DENIC.DE> wrote
> a message of 16 lines which said:
>
>> part of that traffic will be due to old hints files, but priming was
>> actually supposed to accelerate the migration.
>
> Do all resolvers actually perform priming? BIND does but the others?
According to http://www.icann.org/committees/security/sac017.htm most  
do.
But isn't priming only done at startup? And how often do people start
there nameservers? This could be the cause.

So long
-Ralf
---
Ralf.Weber@colt.net


_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email