Re: [DNSOP] AS112 for TLDs

Mohsen Souissi <mohsen.souissi@nic.fr> Wed, 05 December 2007 01:28 UTC

Return-path: <dnsop-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Izj4L-0005Xk-Eh; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 20:28:57 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Izj4J-0005WS-VM for dnsop@ietf.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 20:28:55 -0500
Received: from mx2.nic.fr ([192.134.4.11]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Izj4I-0005sV-GV for dnsop@ietf.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 20:28:55 -0500
Received: from mx2.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id DD1AF1C013D; Wed, 5 Dec 2007 02:28:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay2.nic.fr (relay2.nic.fr [192.134.4.163]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D87EB1C0135; Wed, 5 Dec 2007 02:28:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: from kerkenna.nic.fr (kerkenna.nic.fr [192.134.4.98]) by relay2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5DF658EB9B; Wed, 5 Dec 2007 02:28:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: from kerkenna.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kerkenna.nic.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lB51Srxf092214; Wed, 5 Dec 2007 02:28:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from souissi@kerkenna.nic.fr)
Received: (from souissi@localhost) by kerkenna.nic.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id lB51Srpg092213; Wed, 5 Dec 2007 02:28:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from souissi)
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 02:28:53 +0100
From: Mohsen Souissi <mohsen.souissi@nic.fr>
To: Brian Dickson <briand@ca.afilias.info>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] AS112 for TLDs
Message-ID: <20071205012853.GA92056@kerkenna.nic.fr>
References: <20071127141848.GA16571@nic.fr> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0712031339450.13550@ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca> <47546DB3.1040907@ca.afilias.info>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <47546DB3.1040907@ca.afilias.info>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----)
X-Scan-Signature: 79899194edc4f33a41f49410777972f8
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dnsop-bounces@ietf.org

 On 03 Dec, Brian Dickson wrote:
 | I wonder if it is even necessary to enumerate/instantiate the junk TLDs?
 | 
 | Given that root servers have (by definition) *the* authoritative list of 
 | TLDs, everything else is junk.
 | 
 | Would not it make sense to put in wildcard delegations to AS112?
 | 
 | What are the pros/cons of this, other than the obvious offloading of 
 | junk TLD lookups?

==> If I understand correctly your suggestion:

OK for the first querie, but as the referal to AS112 NS's will lead to
a lame delegation (so no negative caching), for further queries for
those same junk TLDs, root servers will be sollicited again?

So what would you have gained at the end?

Mohsen.

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop