IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] AS112 for TLDs

David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> Fri, 04 April 2008 15:47 UTC

Return-Path: <dnsop-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsop-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0E2B3A6E5E; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 08:47:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29C023A6BCD for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 08:47:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I0R5UHLvuo86 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 08:47:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from virtualized.org (trantor.virtualized.org [204.152.189.190]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 224003A6FC2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 08:46:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.197] (c-24-6-157-180.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.6.157.180]) by virtualized.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F02BD14EF4F; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 08:46:21 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <F9E9D463-E25F-4BC3-ABB5-7EEB7961B30F@virtualized.org>
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
To: Frederico A C Neves <fneves@registro.br>
In-Reply-To: <20080404153014.GE93750@registro.br>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2)
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 08:46:21 -0700
References: <20080404025908.GA6781@vacation.karoshi.com.> <200804040316.m343GWNE061906@drugs.dv.isc.org> <20080404140210.GJ1184@commandprompt.com> <34168149-621F-497C-BCE7-01F68F1B2889@virtualized.org> <20080404151957.GK1184@commandprompt.com> <20080404153014.GE93750@registro.br>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2)
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] AS112 for TLDs
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dnsop-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsop-bounces@ietf.org

On Apr 4, 2008, at 8:30 AM, Frederico A C Neves wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 11:19:58AM -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 07:37:31AM -0700, David Conrad wrote:
> ...
>> I can just imagine the hue and cry that would happen when new top
>> level domains "don't work for everybody".
>
> Or in a future, actually very far from today, when DS records are not
> updated during a rollover.

A self-correcting problem.  The folks that are affected are the ones  
using the non-updated server and no one else. Ideally, there would be  
a way to use standard zone transfer semantics to refresh the zone, but  
the hue and cry would likely serve to put the lackadaisical caching  
server operator on notice that they'd screwed up.

Regards,
-drc

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email