Re: [DNSOP] AS112 for TLDs

Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz> Wed, 05 December 2007 00:35 UTC

Return-path: <dnsop-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IziED-0004ty-0G; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 19:35:05 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IziEA-0004qE-Ua for dnsop@ietf.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 19:35:02 -0500
Received: from hlid.ogud.com ([66.92.146.160] helo=ogud.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IziE8-0002xG-Gn for dnsop@ietf.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 19:35:02 -0500
Received: from [130.129.67.81] (hlid.ogud.com [66.92.146.160]) by ogud.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id lB50YoSa037596; Tue, 4 Dec 2007 19:34:51 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <a0624080cc37ba1875cf0@[130.129.67.81]>
In-Reply-To: <47546DB3.1040907@ca.afilias.info>
References: <20071127141848.GA16571@nic.fr> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0712031339450.13550@ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca> <47546DB3.1040907@ca.afilias.info>
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 16:34:47 -0800
To: Brian Dickson <briand@ca.afilias.info>
From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] AS112 for TLDs
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 66.92.146.160
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9182cfff02fae4f1b6e9349e01d62f32
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dnsop-bounces@ietf.org

At 12:57 -0800 12/3/07, Brian Dickson wrote:

>What are the pros/cons of this, other than the obvious offloading
>of junk TLD lookups?

 From http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0310/pdf/wessels.pdf:

See (unnumbered) slide "Punchline from Last Year's Talk":

Category            Percent of Total (see slide for all cat's)
Unknown TLD          12.5
...
Legitimate            2.15

Of course, that is 2002/2003 data.

6:1 "bad TLD" to "good query."  Off-loading bad TLDs from the roots 
is a big win.  As with any research citation, I encourage readers to 
look it up too - to see if you agree with what I yanked out.
-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis                                                +1-571-434-5468
NeuStar

Think glocally.  Act confused.

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop