IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC as a Best Current Practice

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Thu, 14 April 2022 14:02 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 715EC3A1973; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 07:02:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eu5QQn2efnjE; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 07:02:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62FE33A1A39; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 07:02:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4KfLkd5Dq7zFHZ; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 16:02:33 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1649944953; bh=amGO1f5OkgzUoR9mT4ejSfdBssG9vsG9gqYSnz3OI7I=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=OPjnZezKjmNb6Dj++bkDzcH5RN+I8u+UvpMZYaqu9IT5hgRjvWDeD7VHlSb/6QQDW 5GqH1gjvhIcTZ8GivmTOnZExD81m1+dwQujVow3GEsyfWMNVWpdRZ7j3tfOxzHQXvw jWZ2lzkqgHaR6BdfTga6VnoXT31t1xHaSUK+0Wxc=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bUahf_4l8sOt; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 16:02:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [193.110.157.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 16:02:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DC71E2E21C3; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 10:02:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D91822E21C2; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 10:02:31 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 10:02:31 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
cc: "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>, dnsop-chairs@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <61b46811-fa52-5ec0-e16b-eb7e9d9560d4@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Message-ID: <3ca89d-9aa9-7a28-e7cc-948756eb459e@nohats.ca>
References: <57f1c37b-497c-e1a0-329c-4b9c8b7e197b@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <A9F689C9-4ABF-4947-AA6B-56E2F0C17D13@nohats.ca> <9732682e-78e7-f6bf-84fc-685de22d5e12@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <350d8ab8-0477-b656-8b08-56f7561a7fda@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <CAH1iCiqkAPHq1QBKdkbh86j8UhimjEMG9DU15O9Tkch4BedBjg@mail.gmail.com> <0e2dffab-6afc-b1b6-9028-175f89f0d29e@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <b3bf6748-be6d-a287-27e4-87af36ab10@nohats.ca> <dc4a21ee-cc4c-9cb1-9a56-b4992201378c@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <c47227f6-5556-1e75-3a48-8aa6bad498ac@nohats.ca> <61b46811-fa52-5ec0-e16b-eb7e9d9560d4@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/I-kdNvvX36jM2_tNX4DpTyaBtcg>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC as a Best Current Practice
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 14:02:42 -0000

On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, Masataka Ohta wrote:

>>>  I can't see any reason why you think the root zone is
>>>  more secure than TLDs, especially because, as I wrote:
>>
>>  Because I am informed about their operational procedures and I
>>  contributed to the technical design as one of the for the DNS Root Zone
>>  Key-Signing-Key of the Root Zone Rollover advisory group.
>
> So, you mean the root zone is secure because of "operational
> procedures", which is not cryptographic.

No I did not say that at all.

> Thank you very much to have confirmed my  point that DNSSEC
> is not cryptographically secure.

> Your point is, surely, conclusive.

This twisting of my words has now reached abusive levels, and I hope
the chairs will now take action.

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email