IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC as a Best Current Practice

Bjørn Mork <bjorn@mork.no> Thu, 07 April 2022 15:56 UTC

Return-Path: <bjorn@miraculix.mork.no>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E21183A0BE0 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 08:56:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=mork.no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bsDmIwcI3PIM for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 08:56:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from louie.mork.no (louie.mork.no [IPv6:2001:41c8:51:8a:feff:ff:fe00:e5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 823483A0D98 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 08:56:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from canardo.dyn.mork.no ([IPv6:2a01:799:c9f:8600:0:0:0:1]) (authenticated bits=0) by louie.mork.no (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 237Fu76x505475 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 7 Apr 2022 16:56:10 +0100
Received: from miraculix.mork.no ([IPv6:2a01:799:c9f:8602:8cd5:a7b0:d07:d516]) (authenticated bits=0) by canardo.dyn.mork.no (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 237Fu4I72073489 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 7 Apr 2022 17:56:07 +0200
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mork.no; s=b; t=1649346967; bh=zqGGiXm2Tjie07vflrH5rID5Hr42x4qSpwSk1BVs/xI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:Message-ID:From; b=C7Cj3d+spMy4A1NTeEZSdA/TThzn71SI9JRfbxPee8Dqd9klaZB+ssZkQTE76Ikxe 4NFNcV4oQykxxnl4ajdv7BImENlgQqXuwEsejFJGv+yLLvUByDgKqkEas5ek01TzcZ JeRsehkD88o10kOspYnY3NhHLfcjUYzihhzvqnSs=
Received: (nullmailer pid 717982 invoked by uid 1000); Thu, 07 Apr 2022 15:56:04 -0000
From: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@mork.no>
To: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Organization: m
References: <57f1c37b-497c-e1a0-329c-4b9c8b7e197b@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <A9F689C9-4ABF-4947-AA6B-56E2F0C17D13@nohats.ca> <9732682e-78e7-f6bf-84fc-685de22d5e12@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <350d8ab8-0477-b656-8b08-56f7561a7fda@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <860d0d0-281e-b8c9-4169-5998a95a581f@nohats.ca> <00501a4b-0e47-e25e-2791-d0b80a416793@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2022 17:56:04 +0200
In-Reply-To: <00501a4b-0e47-e25e-2791-d0b80a416793@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> (Masataka Ohta's message of "Fri, 8 Apr 2022 00:01:02 +0900")
Message-ID: <877d80zy3v.fsf@miraculix.mork.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.5 at canardo
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/TJxyzcb9-DCE_sqSuGBzejoFmnQ>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC as a Best Current Practice
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2022 15:56:26 -0000

Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> writes:

> Are there anyone who still think, with reasons, DNSSEC were
> cryptographically secure or had protected TLDs more securely
> than diginotar?

Does DNSSEC make the TLD operators less trustworthy in your eyes?


Bjørn

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email