IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC as a Best Current Practice

Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Mon, 21 March 2022 14:40 UTC

Return-Path: <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 547263A1A17 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 07:40:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VusUSJuZvMmX for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 07:40:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp [131.112.32.132]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 030943A1A71 for <DNSOP@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 07:40:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 50284 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2022 14:36:20 -0000
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (131.112.32.132) by necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp with SMTP; 21 Mar 2022 14:36:20 -0000
Message-ID: <94f2dd5a-db28-c7d7-e738-0bafbb79c9ac@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 23:40:05 +0900
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: DNSOP@ietf.org
References: <e8781ae3-8cfa-1de7-abab-85fe4962b3db@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <12EF36EB-8B22-4656-935B-633BEED86D6A@nohats.ca>
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
In-Reply-To: <12EF36EB-8B22-4656-935B-633BEED86D6A@nohats.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Y-Qlp0VGx_e1ONfb_Jkleytb2Ro>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC as a Best Current Practice
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 14:40:24 -0000

Paul Wouters wrote:

> I tried to substantiate the discussion

I'm afraid you didn't, from the beginning, to have stated:

    it just
    indicates that the value of deploying DNSSEC is often considered
    lower than the cost.

							Masataka Ohta

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email