Re: [DNSOP] Is DNSSEC a Best Current Practice?

[Grant Taylor <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

+10 to aggregating current documentation into one place.

On 3/10/22 12:04 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
> Even better if we would clarify DNSSEC is not an optional part of DNS, 
> but I don’t think you are volunteering for that discussion 😀

Eh ... I'm more interested in aggregating current documentation into one 
place than I am trying to alter the status quo.

I say this because I believe that aggregation / collation of already 
agreed upon (read: published) /current/ standards is a relatively simple 
thing and should have minimal objections.  Conversely, trying to change 
/ update anything will likely garner (non-trivially) more objections.

Perhaps there should be a statement speaking to aggregation / collation 
as opposed to updating in said document.

Aside:  Maybe it's just me, but I feel like there is more perceived 
value in clarifying existing documentation, in the hopes that others 
will be more likely to adopt current best practices, than there is in 
updating things.  Dare I say it, but I feel some urgency to do this.



-- 
Grant. . . .
unix || die