IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC in local networks

"Walter H." <walter.h@mathemainzel.info> Mon, 04 September 2017 08:54 UTC

Return-Path: <walter.h@mathemainzel.info>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 393D113248B for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 01:54:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.721
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.721 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=mathemainzel.info
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zdv8pOSP1fjN for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 01:54:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx06lb.world4you.com (mx06lb.world4you.com [81.19.149.116]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E748A1321AA for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 01:54:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mathemainzel.info; s=dkim11; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Cc:To:From:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID; bh=OBlUHnoAJheV/MT/3uNs9Zgj+zow4FGr6GmXXiknop8=; b=SpTpT7r4HnoWkR+K5zIyQJHwybhxa4K6VDYus1qVKPSKcw6vT+Kdb+DVgNM2tObq7PzQBCBr5fHRP+boRJRo76wM+ZG2P71hqWuPUz+HqX0TJT02nJejT6ZWfPteNAr90gg4EBJgwGGCAJSrOucBLJWi/di8eSVLMWANIIXigIQ=;
Received: from [90.146.55.206] (helo=home.mail) by mx06lb.world4you.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <walter.h@mathemainzel.info>) id 1don9a-0006ak-0Y; Mon, 04 Sep 2017 10:54:46 +0200
Message-ID: <3fe7bc511a990b0288b645dc176e1ef3.1504515284@squirrel.mail>
In-Reply-To: <3B75D240-13B9-4A94-B56D-24E83B4A4A8F@rfc1035.com>
References: <150428805872.6417.9525310755360551475@ietfa.amsl.com> <59A9B760.2060209@mathemainzel.info> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1709012044210.2676@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <59A9BCA2.6060008@mathemainzel.info> <20170903043202.GA18082@besserwisser.org> <59AC4E42.9080600@mathemainzel.info> <60304450-DFA3-4982-B01D-CC33C49BDCFC@isc.org> <59f8c88caaf82a5884aa87223d49e7e4.1504505559@squirrel.mail> <3B75D240-13B9-4A94-B56D-24E83B4A4A8F@rfc1035.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2017 10:54:44 +0200
From: "Walter H." <walter.h@mathemainzel.info>
To: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
Cc: "Walter H." <walter.h@mathemainzel.info>, dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (UNIX; U; Cray X-MP/48; en-US; rv:2.70) Gecko/20110929 Communicator/7.20
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
X-SA-Do-Not-Run: Yes
X-AV-Do-Run: Yes
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 90.146.55.206
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: walter.h@mathemainzel.info
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mx06lb.world4you.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Ih7Xrh7GiHoQPJ9zrOBqCRHvN0I>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC in local networks
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2017 08:54:51 -0000

On Mon, September 4, 2017 10:26, Jim Reid wrote:
>
>> On 4 Sep 2017, at 07:12, Walter H. <Walter.H@mathemainzel.info> wrote:
>>
>> by the way: why are you discussing about DNSSEC for names that are used
>> only locally?
>
> Why do you seem to assume there are never, ever any DNS security issues on
> the local net?

when there are troubles on the local net, DNS security issues are the less
problem ...

I'd say: "either you trust the local net or not";

> Why would someone want to deliberately configure things to prevent
> DNSSEC-aware applications and resolvers from working on the local net?

because of its strange signature procedure: a zone doesn't have to be
resigned, when it changes ...

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email