IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh)

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Sat, 16 September 2017 01:53 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E1081341EB; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 18:53:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.721
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.721 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=XfiEahMp; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=C1vlnH1S
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ShQx3R8gYghK; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 18:53:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8540C129C41; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 18:53:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E120E20D86; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 21:53:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 15 Sep 2017 21:53:00 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=RgqHvZXvQlQO94uL/X KiGVDXGRSewuWEjd6YyjyxgIg=; b=XfiEahMpuKXtqQFXsBTxtzduGsGcLzn50S rIEnxdISPajdq+kyWXrZ13aXHv2ZxFQKvp5eOXUCRwGQe1ExFFY9QSxYgitdOZ1m 9pkNUVsWqcEny2dlhrH82prE90ZZ6bkJMjZeSRo0xGAn4luLU7zI6a+hsd0Pzwh6 +PKP1wHFsGGwoWSMT/DxcLKJNnXEaZuxS4awTLB6Fr2YdBP6GnBoXrtn9faC8STk XQA9+qx1MbCxGSLWKspfj3KQfsYXpxAEvlcc4VdskyFQFWMtEIG3v96edq069Yq6 blMxdHMw6MRnUhTDzFxWimEFVQE8jr2NmC8frtj42/LQmz7agMcw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; bh=RgqHvZXvQlQO94uL/XKiGVDXGRSewuWEjd6YyjyxgIg=; b=C1vlnH1S XcMBnuNF0WYYwzGxXtnjT+wdnPknuRHnmnlUa5cXrrPlKCAuRBUsL/7zi9jwS8pY nk7dWW9/zcdTbjEQBAotmWss1jZgDLhUCzWFjihzfwVJyMEIIIk9F2voKPXP+fCo QBRHZWmOdj5qShipyeKZ47t4C3N0aTzgaki8H5jEbNjC9P0d5Lk4w0iMWaHh5RQ5 gxcTAjsPfpiLy5oFHFhJZPGR4Evl70CeOXeoPVilhDja+antOPIKkpQQCPnta6/U Zaqazq8iQB/9wcoIQkLxAJwACUWm8LUCFk/L8yvNA1IrrCizuIz44r/mIRFm/jWB Ti0ei1sU1FCrAg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:_IO8Weqd5Rgke6KuNoCOtqdQlBcAeK75xygnY24yhkK9XOvss8n00Q>
X-Sasl-enc: XGx23Rydw1rT41OSlpJCodNS4P/uceuM8F06DrNvWnj8 1505526780
Received: from [192.168.1.14] (cpe-124-188-19-231.hdbq1.win.bigpond.net.au [124.188.19.231]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4D1987E446; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 21:52:59 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMCPRfjazW7Kk7GGnu1a0f2QNvgERV-5SGXWzp2HRmPJ=A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2017 11:52:57 +1000
Cc: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, doh@ietf.org, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0EA5CC8C-D4B0-47F4-A8CF-950BDB1A1D55@mnot.net>
References: <150549029332.2975.12341647131707994474.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CA+9kkMBJAP23GmGf_ix-DMeOMB=Rbas+qsBQhrVwZuA5-Cv7Mg@mail.gmail.com> <EB3D58DB-1F8D-4E32-AE71-841EBCDDC3CA@vpnc.org> <42309404-8991-5d1d-7834-59087f273d41@nostrum.com> <CA+9kkMDokEDbBiCR_TRQda2RBHxoHag6mQL57Uzn7ALqakm1Og@mail.gmail.com> <e4a02fff-6803-28c7-c01d-f27a1b282d50@nostrum.com> <CA+9kkMCPRfjazW7Kk7GGnu1a0f2QNvgERV-5SGXWzp2HRmPJ=A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/KkCdmSYJsBoiVEcuebSnnznXizo>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 16 Sep 2017 02:54:38 -0700
Subject: Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh)
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2017 01:53:03 -0000

> On 16 Sep 2017, at 6:53 am, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> You're making an assumption that I don't think is established, that the requests using HTTPS for DNS are not distinguishable from other resources.  If they were keyed by something like dnsh://authority/query-target?RR (to pick on poor old RFC 4501 again), they would be in JavaScript *even if they were not on the wire*.

As before, I read the charter as saying that this protocol will use HTTP in the sense of <https://mnot.github.io/I-D/bcp56bis/#used> -- i.e., defining a new URI scheme is out of scope. If that's not clear, it should be made explicit.



--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email