Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh)

Ask Bjørn Hansen <ask@develooper.com> Thu, 21 September 2017 08:34 UTC

Return-Path: <ask@develooper.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2132E13307B for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 01:34:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s3DUxe1yOiNh for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 01:34:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mbox1.develooper.com (mbox1.develooper.com [207.171.7.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7174127517 for <doh@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 01:34:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mbox1.develooper.com (mbox1.develooper.com [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mbox1.develooper.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B100175A05 for <doh@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 01:34:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 28332 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2017 08:34:45 -0000
Received: from c-67-188-112-34.hsd1.ca.comcast.net (HELO ?10.0.200.101?) (ask@mail.dev@67.188.112.34) by smtp.develooper.com with ESMTPA; 21 Sep 2017 08:34:45 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.0 \(3445.1.6\))
From: =?utf-8?Q?Ask_Bj=C3=B8rn_Hansen?= <ask@develooper.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwhOpnRt8hw3JmvLgxwWpOXcLs0TwAoCZHDe+816bCRp-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 01:34:14 -0700
Cc: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, doh@ietf.org, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A66B9492-D51B-4021-9B65-71284C215595@develooper.com>
References: <150549029332.2975.12341647131707994474.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CA+9kkMBJAP23GmGf_ix-DMeOMB=Rbas+qsBQhrVwZuA5-Cv7Mg@mail.gmail.com> <EB3D58DB-1F8D-4E32-AE71-841EBCDDC3CA@vpnc.org> <42309404-8991-5d1d-7834-59087f273d41@nostrum.com> <CA+9kkMDokEDbBiCR_TRQda2RBHxoHag6mQL57Uzn7ALqakm1Og@mail.gmail.com> <271db5c4-8d29-5a0d-cf7f-58e1e3831c30@cs.tcd.ie> <05C29362-CD48-429C-92FA-7F402869E58C@vpnc.org> <1e8323a8-4afc-397f-209e-099ffca212f6@cs.tcd.ie> <CAOdDvNqOnzpi5fujYGccUFt3oS4if+vALE6dkb9e8eJUh9o_OQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+LwhOpnRt8hw3JmvLgxwWpOXcLs0TwAoCZHDe+816bCRp-Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.1.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/uuFT23qvP1asvhyR4A90vJIR7Zo>
Subject: Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh)
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 08:34:48 -0000


> On Sep 16, 2017, at 9:07, Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> wrote:
> 
> 1) I see no evidence that HTTP/2 is suited to Web Services or will be dominant in that role. HTTP/2 was designed to serve Web Browsing to the exclusion of all other concerns. Which was the right choice to make.

HTTP/2 is also better for services with many small requests, in particular on high latency connections (or where each response might be slow to start…).


Ask