IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Doh] [Ext] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh)

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> Mon, 18 September 2017 18:35 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EF961326ED; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 11:35:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ot4KJ_nd3gnd; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 11:35:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out.west.pexch112.icann.org (pfe112-ca-2.pexch112.icann.org [64.78.40.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B771C1241F3; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 11:35:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) by PMBX112-W1-CA-2.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1178.4; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 11:35:50 -0700
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org ([64.78.40.21]) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG ([64.78.40.21]) with mapi id 15.00.1178.000; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 11:35:50 -0700
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
CC: "doh@ietf.org" <doh@ietf.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ext] [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh)
Thread-Index: AQHTMKO8pv6JW9M6GEuDpCcjcsuo8aK7aMAAgAAFNQA=
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 18:35:50 +0000
Message-ID: <554260AA-653B-4C69-8AE1-E9482797EFFD@icann.org>
References: <150549029332.2975.12341647131707994474.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CA+9kkMBJAP23GmGf_ix-DMeOMB=Rbas+qsBQhrVwZuA5-Cv7Mg@mail.gmail.com> <EB3D58DB-1F8D-4E32-AE71-841EBCDDC3CA@vpnc.org> <42309404-8991-5d1d-7834-59087f273d41@nostrum.com> <CA+9kkMDokEDbBiCR_TRQda2RBHxoHag6mQL57Uzn7ALqakm1Og@mail.gmail.com> <e4a02fff-6803-28c7-c01d-f27a1b282d50@nostrum.com> <CA+9kkMCPRfjazW7Kk7GGnu1a0f2QNvgERV-5SGXWzp2HRmPJ=A@mail.gmail.com> <0EA5CC8C-D4B0-47F4-A8CF-950BDB1A1D55@mnot.net> <CA+9kkMDRdje0LTjAXLJkU6MeEP9tgJOmTjEP3jbtogyFtYYAwA@mail.gmail.com> <32479A66-5D72-48CF-8C33-2D131AEB2B5B@mnot.net> <CA+9kkMCHPO_VO8sO2YUFLHCw8fTKFwoB4-Jy3V22ODHjtVs5YA@mail.gmail.com> <E7353DA6-808C-4779-987A-DE60CEAC94F6@icann.org> <cf2873fe-7753-e56e-acc9-3322081bfa99@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <cf2873fe-7753-e56e-acc9-3322081bfa99@nostrum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [192.0.32.234]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <0A7CF32937FA1047AA20AEE2EBE5EF25@pexch112.icann.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/xNHUMtPiYeGFIxGDKwd0LpvwP60>
Subject: Re: [Doh] [Ext] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh)
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 18:35:54 -0000

On Sep 18, 2017, at 11:17 AM, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:
> 
> On 9/18/17 12:29 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>> In the many discussions leading up to the -00 wording for the charter (which became much longer in IESG discussion)
> 
> $ wc charter-ietf-doh-00-00.txt
>       19     127     831 charter-ietf-doh-00-00.txt
> 
> $ wc charter-ietf-doh-00-06.txt
>       19     168    1124 charter-ietf-doh-00-06.txt
> 
> I'm not sure a 41-word expansion really qualifies as "much longer," especially given that 53 of those words are new text requiring coordination with other WGs that have a vested interest in this topic.

Good point.

> This conversation might be more productive if we hedge away from hyperbole.

Indeed, and I apologize for injecting that last bit of hyperbole here. FWIW, it is my intention to be a good document editor and follow WG consensus on what needs to be added as the eventual WG discussion evolves.

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email