Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh)

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Sun, 17 September 2017 18:24 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33E1F1332DF; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 11:24:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Li5i7VNx14AA; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 11:24:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x233.google.com (mail-io0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C32991321CB; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 11:24:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x233.google.com with SMTP id q11so14158328ioe.10; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 11:24:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cVysbBT7nGiA+m5LB9gCJsKzwWecVElpvdgjiJ4xZ3Y=; b=taKoGROe6HMroWVW6DWYpTS8+/bFbPsZQTjP+gPCPjHTN7ENtmT9oTxazJ5pPzvKE0 FE3IN074buZemD/IBfqarTnylEuYjuN5gxkWXARkKqLcVOZN1atrgXq8/5WAYjEMu/xk YNtXvIII6ijuU0TH8QcJwdZdJzqVT1q7NO43RW7kisFc1tCMqciMDYD8r/XOS19wItKP Upvutvm5TYYtPTToiJQNyUn+7/BtTOZSQJWwEaieDv98hkPySgGJEfVuiROfg9x3agW5 Okc94gzKORYmIhc89vQ+GXFcFjpkB82GdAt82yd220JD0/96eGXH9hj1BCmNhsWH+FQC gplw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=cVysbBT7nGiA+m5LB9gCJsKzwWecVElpvdgjiJ4xZ3Y=; b=N4NJThz94hAbrJuEvr+OJuzZvf5F3numDBL6q5f7j2tuFYsR3uH3NWlD5/a/1EeUY0 Yfjuu/bxjV7W/Bs7/cHHvCyTHrrfarTW0D4+nFIWiZy/q7lJNi2LPZR3bbBt1nvNgb6o HubuvmcBkC0rpBmL2vYaJ2jOYrQn0ZapywDn5kcID8KM/QbU+EZ+TacW5KryzPJOYtNS ONib1Wf8a4rWgkYL8+9YfzT+4ofnT8XRaPNnyU9Vc554ezUTRxavmlZhgBAVq5hIq2A4 jehvrNnKNB/hO1YaSWiL90Ji1qNgB88vK39ob/9f1+E79+hkoagm+Qm9/u+MdjJrwotS BzXA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUhZJ7WaWa4X0Kj34uxjYoDHwUahfCxf8N4pmiFc8zbb9sZmp0Re Ot+eO9rudVQQHBBf
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QD72ViPg/FV8DLLbEM9Oilx3sbzIZRFh1Fv89vh7t8U6Qmcfm9UgpxPCHBDuUTbA9O2XZpUKA==
X-Received: by 10.107.176.70 with SMTP id z67mr17688493ioe.81.1505672646690; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 11:24:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from twicinski-ltm1.internal.salesforce.com (184-14-212-55.dr03.chtn.wv.frontiernet.net. [184.14.212.55]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id k133sm476100itd.0.2017.09.17.11.24.04 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 17 Sep 2017 11:24:05 -0700 (PDT)
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
Cc: doh@ietf.org, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <150549029332.2975.12341647131707994474.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CA+9kkMBJAP23GmGf_ix-DMeOMB=Rbas+qsBQhrVwZuA5-Cv7Mg@mail.gmail.com> <EB3D58DB-1F8D-4E32-AE71-841EBCDDC3CA@vpnc.org> <42309404-8991-5d1d-7834-59087f273d41@nostrum.com> <CA+9kkMDokEDbBiCR_TRQda2RBHxoHag6mQL57Uzn7ALqakm1Og@mail.gmail.com> <271db5c4-8d29-5a0d-cf7f-58e1e3831c30@cs.tcd.ie> <05C29362-CD48-429C-92FA-7F402869E58C@vpnc.org> <1e8323a8-4afc-397f-209e-099ffca212f6@cs.tcd.ie> <CAOdDvNqOnzpi5fujYGccUFt3oS4if+vALE6dkb9e8eJUh9o_OQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+LwhOpnRt8hw3JmvLgxwWpOXcLs0TwAoCZHDe+816bCRp-Q@mail.gmail.com> <bff51f47-d780-4def-536e-39e53b06c266@cs.tcd.ie>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <de59cb2d-9c0c-d9ab-2359-7c3e0627fe87@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 14:24:04 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <bff51f47-d780-4def-536e-39e53b06c266@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/Vw1OMmHGeaMUIfZzbyBF-KQlNjU>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 08:01:38 -0700
Subject: Re: [Doh] WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh)
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 18:24:09 -0000


On 9/16/17 12:15 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> 
> 
> On 16/09/17 17:07, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
>> We had a re-run of the same issues with DPRIV which began with the
>> assertion that a solution must be found within a year.
> 
> I don't recall any such assertion. IIRC, DPRIVE was always
> considered as the start, within the IETF, of a marathon.
> (At least by anyone credible.)
> 
> Perhaps you can provide a pointer to that assertion?
> 
> Aside from that, I'm not clear who you think is being
> ignored with the current proposal, nor what you think
> we ought wait upon, so it'd help me understand your
> objections if you could clarify those aspects. (FWIW,
> as of now, I don't share your concerns in those respects
> at all.)
> 
> S.
> 

As DPRIV co-chair, I agree with Stephen's assertion that this was always 
going to be a marathon.  Now Phillip is correct in some respects - I 
felt *a* solution for the stub to recursive resolver piece could be 
worked out within a year.  But I've always felt the IETF was all about 
iteration: Let's come up with a solution; let's write some code and 
deploy some infrastructure; let's measure the behavior and the 
usefulness of what was done; and in the interim let's keep looking at 
other ideas.

The next steps within DPRIV are around the recursive resolvers talking 
to authoritative servers; and this is something Terry (our wonderful AD) 
and myself see as a much harder problem, and one most likely that will 
end in failure.

tim