IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [gaia] Review required: draft-irtf-gaia-alternative-network-deployments

"Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com> Sun, 20 March 2016 13:57 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC41312D6A5; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 06:57:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.922
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.922 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lhzx5r1z0m4y; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 06:57:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx143.netapp.com (mx143.netapp.com [216.240.21.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 056DB12D57C; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 06:57:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,366,1455004800"; d="scan'208";a="103846973"
Received: from hioexcmbx07-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.122.105.40]) by mx143-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 20 Mar 2016 06:52:29 -0700
Received: from HIOEXCMBX07-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.40) by hioexcmbx07-prd.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.40) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1156.6; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 06:52:28 -0700
Received: from HIOEXCMBX07-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([::1]) by hioexcmbx07-prd.hq.netapp.com ([fe80::c07c:8fcd:f7e4:f32b%21]) with mapi id 15.00.1156.000; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 06:52:28 -0700
From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
To: Aaron Kaplan <aaron@lo-res.org>
Thread-Topic: [gaia] Review required: draft-irtf-gaia-alternative-network-deployments
Thread-Index: AQHRgqkyVTnWsMdXV0SJZnEauicqSJ9iWiiD
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 13:52:28 +0000
Message-ID: <DC7BF522-B153-46AB-BA0F-685DC57CA36D@netapp.com>
References: <003101d17914$247b6b30$6d724190$@unizar.es> <56E8294E.6040807@article19.org> <a1bda1d46bf7fa6c87ea9c678823b38a@unizar.es> <56EC0A21.8010009@article19.org> <00c301d18128$a40e71a0$ec2b54e0$@unizar.es> <20160320125110.GD32067@mate.lo-res.org> <56EE9EE1.9030700@cs.tcd.ie>,<20160320130532.GE32067@mate.lo-res.org>
In-Reply-To: <20160320130532.GE32067@mate.lo-res.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gaia/aK5_zTLwXiqB5pqXgTXbYEgydTk>
Cc: Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org>, Matthew Ford <ford@isoc.org>, "gaia@irtf.org" <gaia@irtf.org>, Jose Saldana <jsaldana@unizar.es>, Internet Research Steering Group <irsg@irtf.org>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Subject: Re: [gaia] Review required: draft-irtf-gaia-alternative-network-deployments
X-BeenThere: gaia@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Global Access to the Internet for All <gaia.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gaia/>
List-Post: <mailto:gaia@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 13:57:36 -0000

RG list may be better, if they agree to go public.

-- 
Sent from a mobile device; please excuse typos.
+49 151 120 55791

> On Mar 20, 2016, at 14:05, Aaron Kaplan <aaron@lo-res.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 01:00:17PM +0000, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On 20/03/16 12:51, Aaron Kaplan wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 04:12:50PM +0100, Jose Saldana wrote:
>>>> The new version of the draft has just been submitted.
>>>> 
>>>> Best regards and thanks a lot!
>>>> 
>>>> Jose
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The paper rised some eyebrows amongst the community networks - 
>>> in a surprised, rather negative way.
>>> People had the feeling that the paper does not reflect reality very
>>> much.
>>> 
>>> Seems like the community networks were not really interviewed properly.
>> 
>> That sound concerning but not actionable.
>> 
>> Is there any way to get detailed feedback on that that would
>> allow the authors/RG to improve the draft or otherwise document
>> what's claimed to be missing here?
> 
> 
> I think I can help with that.
> I'll forward all the people who had some comments / were a bit wondering
> about the publication to the author.
> Let's see if it works out.
> 
> Best,
> a.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gaia mailing list
> gaia@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email