Re: [hybi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt> (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Wed, 27 July 2011 13:45 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85FC021F8439; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 06:45:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.647
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.647 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.030, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8ws575zqUNon; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 06:45:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qy0-f172.google.com (mail-qy0-f172.google.com [209.85.216.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 780DB21F8581; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 06:45:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qyk9 with SMTP id 9so2422950qyk.10 for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 06:45:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.78.67 with SMTP id j3mr30313qck.253.1311774338829; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 06:45:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.224.212 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 06:45:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20110727124545.GA6931@1wt.eu>
References: <CABLsOLCgxDNDs54GUybBzmG8a6rNPzXzFcwf_OU25j5L+AobaQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfnp+kNqnU-_x2ZBZnN8fzP=4+6WO=QPjw1rJzvZmSXEAg@mail.gmail.com> <20110724185949.GB22405@1wt.eu> <9031.1311538720.416128@puncture> <20110724204236.GG22405@1wt.eu> <CALiegfkgukeaiMR-Yc15qUJYCB-KPcoNoX4G6NrN4+DOiDS+tw@mail.gmail.com> <20110726192850.GB3692@1wt.eu> <CALiegfndubt3xgRLFWUikhizsvX60p4+b0DcouX0_m5B8vestg@mail.gmail.com> <20110727101757.GA6586@1wt.eu> <CALiegfmMO2Es6P=qy4m=XULVQE9bDp7S0LYXG_9n4Lk9yirGXQ@mail.gmail.com> <20110727124545.GA6931@1wt.eu>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 15:45:38 +0200
Message-ID: <CALiegf=YCCYuoVk1isPOwfB1z8mpSxbJmFHU5vEyQo7xOGH5RA@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?I=C3=B1aki_Baz_Castillo?= <ibc@aliax.net>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi@ietf.org>, IETF-Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt> (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:45:46 -0000

2011/7/27 Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>eu>:
> Once again, the goal to make SRV adopted BY USERS is not to ensure that
> it tries to cover all the server-side needs, but that it offers better
> quality of service to USERS. That way USERS will massively adopt it and
> server will one day be able to safely rely on it. Just like neither
> Javascript nor cookies nor flash are mandatory, still all of them are
> very common in practice and many service providers happily rely on them.

Thanks for your useful comments (as always in these threads). Let me
just a question:

What do you mean with "USERS"? Do you mean home users in front of
their web browsers? or webbrowser vendors?
I don't think home users (neither professional users) has nothing to
decide here, they will not "resolve" the WS URI retrieved from a
webpage.
So we are talking about webbrowser vendors, right? and typically there
are no more than.... 10?

Regards.


-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>