Re: [Idr] Vendor PM/PLM and IDR

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Wed, 21 September 2016 19:47 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4752712BDD2 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 12:47:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.217
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.217 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.316, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eWZ-6KS1BOA1 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 12:47:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33F4712BDD1 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 12:47:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dresden.attlocal.net (99-59-193-67.lightspeed.livnmi.sbcglobal.net [99.59.193.67]) by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 282391E332; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 15:49:06 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4C12AF39-411A-4EC0-9E60-8240637F07BA"
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
In-Reply-To: <A5903745-46A0-4EDF-8DEB-7509F310B516@puck.nether.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 15:47:40 -0400
Message-Id: <4D7D5106-2FD5-4260-ABD5-CAC0BF501FC9@pfrc.org>
References: <20160914163247.GD80448@shrubbery.net> <A529D36C-99EE-4958-9DF5-BDB056608606@steffann.nl> <20160914172058.GA28887@puck.nether.net> <CA+b+ERk3Kk_qus2hts=0p05SoZBKTQFLukK1inB3WrzxQO2iAg@mail.gmail.com> <4DAAC259-ED56-48DA-8086-DB8C07692F70@steffann.nl> <af7115318bff46d8961b63d292282cc8@XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com> <CA+b+ERmN7-WoVs4aHHs5AdqYpTxTJ1pTAysw2L2BoO4=F4puZg@mail.gmail.com> <57D9BEB8.7010109@foobar.org> <CA+b+ERnQ8U9_2EtFgyxdSRtN2SW-dcPKOmD+JbemqpcVcH9S7Q@mail.gmail.com> <57D9C5D2.3080000@foobar.org> <20160914223521.GB15934@pfrc.org> <57DA823D.6020303@foobar.org> <CA+b+ERn3qjOixQBD_XQxMq+t3bhHQSbuJfmwfmWFUMHgOcr68Q@mail.gmail.com> <57DA87D8.2000301@foobar.org> <CA+b+ERmEYQxT+vUOa8iB7aLhc-aM2OKN2WNWKZsxkqQ+2gjNKQ@mail.gmail.com> <57DAB00B.5060703@i3d.net> <749C12B8-844A-4C59-9B8B-21C6746CFFDB@alcatel-lucent.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1609210537510.1477@uplift.swm.pp.se> <43882608-BBFF-4218-81F8-10CBC38B0E8C@alcatel-lucent.com> <7fb54daa-3b03-5e2e-30ef-67f4151efe55@i3d.net> <A59 03745-46A0-4EDF-8DEB-7509F310B516@puck.nether.net>
To: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/2OLw2vGZT2WxegyjOk287PNS5_w>
Cc: idr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Idr] Vendor PM/PLM and IDR
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 19:47:43 -0000

> On Sep 21, 2016, at 3:12 PM, Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Sep 21, 2016, at 3:05 PM, i3D.net - Martijn Schmidt <martijnschmidt@i3d.net> wrote:
>> 
>> Andrew,
>> From an operator's perspective - when we go to $vendor and ask for a
>> feature that must inter-operate with other vendors' boxes but where no
>> official standard exists, we typically just get told "no such RFC" after
>> which the feature request is punted to /dev/null. I'm sure many of those
>> requests do not end up at your desk simply because the rest of your
>> organization filters out the noise.
> 
> I was told to use extended or wide, which aren’t implemented.
> 
> eg:
> 
> (first draft in 2009):
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-as4octet-extcomm-generic-subtype <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-as4octet-extcomm-generic-subtype>

set policy-options community something-four members 0x0204:2514L:100

Although I find that there's a display bug on receipt.  Matches fine though.  

-- Jeff (sigh)