IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Request to adopt draft-heitz-idr-large-community - Working Group Adoption call (9/6 to 9/20)

"Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <jheitz@cisco.com> Fri, 09 September 2016 15:37 UTC

Return-Path: <jheitz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABEE212B2C5 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Sep 2016 08:37:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.029
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.029 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.508, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xGn9IzjCdR52 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Sep 2016 08:37:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C46F712B33D for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Sep 2016 08:30:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1165; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1473435007; x=1474644607; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=wi3iAFckHF88g2QA05QMeuSxQbgiQf//2PQqpWQxP7U=; b=bLsbet/VskJd5sL01/OJyNRr6PCYm97DeAUkum+KbiOBcetsqdOQJwig QlsCxujUTX4n6HXyDP2XvFuN22CGKPgG4t5rBvnGmJqzgpZyRi1FXJQ2r RPTujcVshxV8cuhCpYssGRzrfaE7hyToX6GYyDl9h/YZUlzhMGo1J78iz g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0A1AQCY1NJX/4MNJK1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBgzkBAQEBAR6BU40zqxaCA4YcAoFLOBQBAgEBAQEBAQFeJ4RhAQEBAwE6PwULAgEIDgoeBQsyJQEBBA4FFIguCL4gAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAR6GMIF4CIJOgSKDAQEBG4Mtgi8BBJlhAY9Dj2Bvi2SDegEeNoMkgTZwhQuCHwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.30,305,1470700800"; d="scan'208";a="149408638"
Received: from alln-core-1.cisco.com ([173.36.13.131]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 09 Sep 2016 15:30:06 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-011.cisco.com (xch-rcd-011.cisco.com [173.37.102.21]) by alln-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u89FU63A007093 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 9 Sep 2016 15:30:06 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-014.cisco.com (173.36.7.24) by XCH-RCD-011.cisco.com (173.37.102.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Fri, 9 Sep 2016 10:30:06 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-014.cisco.com ([173.36.7.24]) by XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com ([173.36.7.24]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Fri, 9 Sep 2016 10:30:06 -0500
From: "Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <jheitz@cisco.com>
To: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] Request to adopt draft-heitz-idr-large-community - Working Group Adoption call (9/6 to 9/20)
Thread-Index: AdIIXx8kYqc7BdVrTmq7GfG1a3fUeAB58GAAAADGVYD//7P9u4ABaKmA//+tev4=
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2016 15:30:05 +0000
Message-ID: <FFBB4655-0413-4D4E-A036-962CA790A878@cisco.com>
References: <01ab01d2085f$67c6e8d0$3754ba70$@ndzh.com> <20160908220428.GB24093@pfrc.org> <D3F75B31.7DA12%acee@cisco.com> <FE45E323-F465-4E13-B09F-9519CE31671B@cisco.com>, <20160909152527.GA8370@pfrc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20160909152527.GA8370@pfrc.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/k6INnKvcTO40-GP2K8-tUd9np5s>
Cc: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Request to adopt draft-heitz-idr-large-community - Working Group Adoption call (9/6 to 9/20)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2016 15:37:35 -0000

I had endless discussions with Robert on the format of the common header and I don't have the appetite anymore. Besides, it's not needed. Attribute exhaustion is a strawman.

Thanks,
Jakob.


> On Sep 9, 2016, at 11:24 AM, Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 10:54:36PM +0000, Jakob Heitz (jheitz) wrote:
>> Jeff, you proposed to split a common header out of the wide communities draft as a separate draft and I agreed. Then Robert didn't want to do that and published -03 of the wide communities. So be it.
> 
> The discussion circled around the *logistics* of the split.  Robert would
> prefer not to, I'm supportive of it.  John requested we take this discussion
> to the mail list, hence I'm doing so.
> 
> Tersely, with a common header, I'm supportive of a separate 4:4 draft as
> long as it's built on a common header as per the other discussion.  That
> header can be in a separate draft; Robert has updated wide -03 in a way that
> shows how the split may be done.
> 
> In the absence of a common header, I would not be supportive of the current
> proposal.
> 
> -- Jeff

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email