Re: [Idr] Request to adopt draft-heitz-idr-large-community - Working Group Adoption call (9/6 to 9/20)

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Wed, 21 September 2016 10:00 UTC

Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CD7912B1BD for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 03:00:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gXWVz-SWoBwL for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 03:00:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x236.google.com (mail-wm0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB73E12B1B5 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 03:00:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x236.google.com with SMTP id b130so82058894wmc.0 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 03:00:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=/RRht7fORSZ96cVJ/vz7pLzCY9PuplNgRChi5KHs4Wk=; b=vWQQlyAcRNVAV/36NtvhP5FEE6baljKX/EAlYh1gWEoolMRzbOKcoPJUW7GLTe0C7D dRnkbtIHNd0JH3a6hANDFZ5U50U84E94VzaFvSSkxGIrchnRRLqDb9cfocDtpPx5QGYz kzZ+ajZgj/crUdmFqIPwVxKon7EsHyN+TlpOcnnYccLet6wUNy0Z52KGsUaTwvirgkNs 07WsSYBehqMvUofuPVsGWQHutUAI5JPu99EwwCNr5X0lOMOwZ0n+xxOWLsr6trQ9p+W7 P5KML2cagwTHmNAc9aBjCEpTX2lOWmp62S5ovYnAFt0X9wykiojEFrPbZfolI8EXcx/M JXtg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/RRht7fORSZ96cVJ/vz7pLzCY9PuplNgRChi5KHs4Wk=; b=VpMfGbREZx2uwfUhMYtii5sHxmzOvPk1voFaZUwtGVSia9HYyC5pLIpYztRCvBDsk2 zn4mUmsX+5Qk3lbPMXyLqDOnxTsfO1SZrkSKHtSzKjDsFUVom4f9RbX2HQkSxdQLYCxe SPR/04YYgOzNQDIxMXwl2q2GJz7SccIVo6HgW7NQSeZRLo9ipCJPeLdfjRTlBU4/wR1h 7fXi2fU+/ISqhwe8F+8ecGtFmf9TKoN+TBNpyMbwmYq02/DyFVRWKA4naLom+a3QF06w pla3gbJomIr9DnWEqhuhsjHzzoVLSTomu3r+sErS21PW4y6/AzGqkhdBUv6Fj4aN9Z8R OOTQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwPhW53NvlINEg2ew3nftKbVtVp1MYHmJakffMrchFsQnvh0aNvtt1bND2l7JkutGON06wvMapzXH1k54w==
X-Received: by 10.194.157.164 with SMTP id wn4mr32028532wjb.142.1474452016427; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 03:00:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com
Received: by 10.80.153.44 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 03:00:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <D56CA059-56AC-48A6-B832-177A637F0CC4@puck.nether.net>
References: <E7A5509A-4B20-44A9-9FBE-284734B5E2FD@cisco.com> <20160909155047.GD8370@pfrc.org> <CA+b+ERnyFi_0_rfW6F2uV8AGuBXm=zpRLuWAiyrmEMmXnrY6CA@mail.gmail.com> <A0FF8539-2868-46A8-995D-7D57705D8AA3@alcatel-lucent.com> <CA+b+ERk9vOdzacXjjmhK2uWFM+Aad8gK3KLJQBeFVb2XwbW3fA@mail.gmail.com> <6190874E-0CC8-4437-9117-F7429242064B@puck.nether.net> <CA+b+ERm82jJPzHJGgmwKWY-T+q97D8tRUWW3rh6hYr3iV4BKag@mail.gmail.com> <D0E1DDA5-2C26-46A2-95BC-C7A7B19F2F8B@steffann.nl> <20160914161526.GA19429@puck.nether.net> <20160914162702.GC80448@shrubbery.net> <20160914162919.GD19429@puck.nether.net> <123D938E-E345-4572-84A4-377669A8F6FD@alcatel-lucent.com> <D56CA059-56AC-48A6-B832-177A637F0CC4@puck.nether.net>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 12:00:14 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0anR0sNxN9kMICC_uTC98fXl0P0
Message-ID: <CA+b+ERm4gm9FctgaAYyC=rr51EX=Pzsd-4+gef1v=VpkqXYwQg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e013c646aad78f3053d019c1d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/6e7b_oxDr_akIbKlmDs3Yum3qgo>
Cc: John Heasley <heas@shrubbery.net>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Request to adopt draft-heitz-idr-large-community - Working Group Adoption call (9/6 to 9/20)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 10:00:20 -0000

Jared,

This is what we see occur.  There are documented and undocumented
> communities that may exist.  This is why the central site that Joe Provo
> pointed to is critical to operators,


​If something as you admit is critical to operators to run the network
shouldn't it be maintained by IANA registry rather then sit on private web
sites ?

Thx,
R.​


> many technical teams have difficulties getting the marketing folks to post
> it on the website.  Often like many things, it’s low on the todo list and
> just doesn’t get done in a timely fashion.