IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Request to adopt draft-heitz-idr-large-community - Working Group Adoption call (9/6 to 9/20)

Jay Borkenhagen <jayb@braeburn.org> Fri, 16 September 2016 19:56 UTC

Return-Path: <jayb@oz.mt.att.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5A88128B44 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 12:56:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.619
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.619 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8lCztn2JlF4Q for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 12:56:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.149.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F0DF126D74 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 12:56:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0049295.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0049295.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.16.0.17/8.16.0.17) with SMTP id u8GJspTX015394 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 15:56:43 -0400
Received: from alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (sbcsmtp6.sbc.com [144.160.229.23]) by m0049295.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 25gn7tt1sb-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 15:56:41 -0400
Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u8GJufk1023531 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 15:56:41 -0400
Received: from alpi131.aldc.att.com (alpi131.aldc.att.com [130.8.218.69]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u8GJuZaF023464 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 15:56:36 -0400
Received: from alpi153.aldc.att.com (alpi153.aldc.att.com [130.8.42.31]) by alpi131.aldc.att.com (RSA Interceptor) for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 19:56:19 GMT
Received: from aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi153.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u8GJuJqm010174 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 15:56:19 -0400
Received: from oz.mt.att.com (oz.mt.att.com [135.16.165.23]) by alpi153.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u8GJuHNH010065 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 15:56:18 -0400
Received: by oz.mt.att.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 012A8A4095F; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 15:56:16 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: emacs 24.3.1 (via feedmail 11-beta-1 I); VM 8.2.0b under 24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Message-ID: <22492.20062.387526.453517@oz.mt.att.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 15:56:14 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jay Borkenhagen <jayb@braeburn.org>
To: idr@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20160915174612.GK25536@puck.nether.net>
References: <57D9C5D2.3080000@foobar.org> <20160914223521.GB15934@pfrc.org> <57DA823D.6020303@foobar.org> <CA+b+ERn3qjOixQBD_XQxMq+t3bhHQSbuJfmwfmWFUMHgOcr68Q@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1609151505290.1477@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CA+b+ERmMfdaGuXb4BcTFGX2Pdr64E-OFCWCGq3o-2X1KHgXP-A@mail.gmail.com> <20160915143220.GQ79185@Space.Net> <m2a8f9cfo9.wl-randy@psg.com> <20160915164803.GI25536@puck.nether.net> <m237l1cdac.wl-randy@psg.com> <20160915174612.GK25536@puck.nether.net>
X-GPG-Fingerprint: DDDB 542E D988 94D0 82D3 D198 7DED 6648 2308 D3C0
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2016-09-16_10:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=13 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1034 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1609020000 definitions=main-1609160252
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/P9Zn-cRiJzztJtiJPRQcYtkNy6Q>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Request to adopt draft-heitz-idr-large-community - Working Group Adoption call (9/6 to 9/20)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Jay Borkenhagen <jayb@braeburn.org>
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 19:56:45 -0000

 > >     0                   1                   2                   3
 > >     0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
 > >    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 > >    |                      Autonomous System number                 |
 > >    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 > >    |                          Local Data Part 1                    |
 > >    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 > >    |                          Local Data Part 2                    |
 > >    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 > > 
 > > sufficient?  that is a binary question.  i am interested in answers from
 > > operators such as nick, gert, ...
 > 
 > 	Yes.
 > 
 > 	(with repeated caveat of not calling it ASN).
 > 
 > 	- jared
 > 

Sufficient for me as well.  Strongly in favor of large at 32:32:32
over anything else I've heard discussed here.

						Jay B.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email