Re: [Idr] Request to adopt draft-heitz-idr-large-community - Working Group Adoption call (9/6 to 9/20)

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Wed, 21 September 2016 13:00 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4816E12B3B2 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 06:00:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.217
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.217 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.316, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VXZhbsQI48Hg for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 06:00:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B2C612B2CC for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 05:59:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dresden.attlocal.net (99-59-193-67.lightspeed.livnmi.sbcglobal.net [99.59.193.67]) by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C39311E332; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 09:00:26 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_44C696BA-266B-4F1D-B029-ACC51C07730E"
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20160921074701.GL79185@Space.Net>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 08:59:00 -0400
Message-Id: <C23E8EE6-52A0-406A-A360-95FE1C059620@pfrc.org>
References: <57D9BEB8.7010109@foobar.org> <CA+b+ERnQ8U9_2EtFgyxdSRtN2SW-dcPKOmD+JbemqpcVcH9S7Q@mail.gmail.com> <57D9C5D2.3080000@foobar.org> <20160914223521.GB15934@pfrc.org> <57DA823D.6020303@foobar.org> <CA+b+ERn3qjOixQBD_XQxMq+t3bhHQSbuJfmwfmWFUMHgOcr68Q@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1609151505290.1477@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CA+b+ERmMfdaGuXb4BcTFGX2Pdr64E-OFCWCGq3o-2X1KHgXP-A@mail.gmail.com> <57DABA56.8020500@foobar.org> <7283AE8D-6FC9-433B-A652-84F3A3ABAAE8@alcatel-lucent.com> <20160921074701.GL79185@Space.Net>
To: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/J7zPSkFvlWx4Vo6dbLew4oCufs8>
Cc: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Request to adopt draft-heitz-idr-large-community - Working Group Adoption call (9/6 to 9/20)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 13:00:11 -0000

> On Sep 21, 2016, at 3:47 AM, Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
> 
> This is why "large".  It has implementations.  *Running code*.

Shipping code?

If not, the argument is a tedious distraction.

If so, you want random vendors and software-only BGP implementations to put not-even-adopted drafts into your routing system?

Fait accompli much?

-- Jeff