IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Request to adopt draft-heitz-idr-large-community - Working Group Adoption call (9/6 to 9/20)

"Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <jheitz@cisco.com> Thu, 08 September 2016 22:54 UTC

Return-Path: <jheitz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E700112B274 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Sep 2016 15:54:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.029
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.029 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.508, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5mtVJciyzh0O for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Sep 2016 15:54:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CDEC128B44 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Sep 2016 15:54:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3142; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1473375277; x=1474584877; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=aS/1E6E3HRXD8e1E1x0ErZdauPqNRKXHNaXTJ4BaP6c=; b=AvoiDiI9yBS98y1Om7rFwJ1RkACDFBjlxwrnjhNEzK8yhRHz1r1Ia/ZC TKhuKFRAcvmBeW+/GdTrIL+UpOyKIPjYY7R2MVrbgqXN2nBqs8XcUdozt pEIDQiXYE5U7hZUg2rbANTsdc7lew/UoGjYaUZiNvu1IVxFiz/TonolWa M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CfAQDw6tFX/4kNJK1dGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBgzkBAQEBAR5XbQ+NM6sSggMZC4V4AhyBRDgUAQIBAQEBAQEBXieEYQEBAQMBAQEBMToLBQsCAQgYBB8JAgIlCyUBAQQOBRSILggOlBidHgiMOQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARcFgQKFLoF4glaBIoMegn4vgi8FmV4Bjz+BboRfiRBvi2KDegEeNoMfgTVwh2MBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.30,302,1470700800"; d="scan'208";a="149143994"
Received: from alln-core-4.cisco.com ([173.36.13.137]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 08 Sep 2016 22:54:37 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-014.cisco.com (xch-rcd-014.cisco.com [173.37.102.24]) by alln-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u88Msb0E016076 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 8 Sep 2016 22:54:37 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-014.cisco.com (173.36.7.24) by XCH-RCD-014.cisco.com (173.37.102.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Thu, 8 Sep 2016 17:54:36 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-014.cisco.com ([173.36.7.24]) by XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com ([173.36.7.24]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Thu, 8 Sep 2016 17:54:36 -0500
From: "Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <jheitz@cisco.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] Request to adopt draft-heitz-idr-large-community - Working Group Adoption call (9/6 to 9/20)
Thread-Index: AdIIXx8kYqc7BdVrTmq7GfG1a3fUeAB58GAAAADGVYD//7P9uw==
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2016 22:54:36 +0000
Message-ID: <FE45E323-F465-4E13-B09F-9519CE31671B@cisco.com>
References: <01ab01d2085f$67c6e8d0$3754ba70$@ndzh.com> <20160908220428.GB24093@pfrc.org>,<D3F75B31.7DA12%acee@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D3F75B31.7DA12%acee@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/skz3QfPLyzn-g8zAmNQnW5jQUI0>
Cc: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Request to adopt draft-heitz-idr-large-community - Working Group Adoption call (9/6 to 9/20)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2016 22:54:40 -0000

Jeff, you proposed to split a common header out of the wide communities draft as a separate draft and I agreed. Then Robert didn't want to do that and published -03 of the wide communities. So be it.

Thanks,
Jakob.


> On Sep 8, 2016, at 6:27 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jeff, 
> 
> I thought the result of this discussion at IETF 96 was to separate out the
> wide community header into a separate draft? This would provide
> compatibility for coexistence. Correct me if I am wrong.
> 
> Also, I believe if you go through the complete E-mail thread, you’ll see
> that the positioning of the two drafts has already been discussed.
> 
> Now that all the authors have responded to the IPR poll, I’d advise the
> chairs to the consider the “bring a horse to water” rule when considering
> whether or not to allow the WG adoption poll to proceed.
> 
> Thanks,
> Acee 
> 
> 
> On 9/8/16, 6:04 PM, "Idr on behalf of Jeffrey Haas" <idr-bounces@ietf.org
> on behalf of jhaas@pfrc.org> wrote:
> 
>> Sue and John,
>> 
>>> On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 12:54:59PM -0400, Susan Hares wrote:
>>> Job:
>>> 
>>> We'd be glad to start a WG adoption poll starting today (9/6 to 9/20).
>>> 
>>> The Authors should indicate if they have IPR or know of any IPR.   If
>>> the
>>> authors indicate IPR within 1-2 days, we'll let the poll continue.  If
>>> not,
>>> we'll halt this adoption poll to await the authors response.
>> 
>> It's worth pointing out the functionality covered by
>> draft-heitz-idr-large-community is already covered in
>> draft-ietf-idr-wide-bgp-communities.
>> 
>> wide -02 previously handled the encoding in TLV format.  Per discussion at
>> the recent IETF, -03 moved to a flattened format.
>> 
>> The wide communities draft is already adopted IDR work.
>> 
>> Please also see my note to idr in subject "community of the day - common
>> header".
>> 
>> Please take the above in consideration for the adoption call.
>> 
>> -- Jeff
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Idr mailing list
>> Idr@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email