IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] community of the day - common header

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Fri, 09 September 2016 15:36 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@slice.pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 293B612B417 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Sep 2016 08:36:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.41
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.41 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.508, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jHW79d9G4W-M for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Sep 2016 08:36:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDADF12B2AA for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Sep 2016 08:27:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id BCF881E331; Fri, 9 Sep 2016 11:28:42 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2016 11:28:42 -0400
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Message-ID: <20160909152842.GB8370@pfrc.org>
References: <20160908214031.GA23544@pfrc.org> <57D2A3A8.70904@foobar.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <57D2A3A8.70904@foobar.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/uwfLaQ3zT6NoLjA892gdL5hW1DU>
Cc: idr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Idr] community of the day - common header
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2016 15:36:26 -0000

Nick,

On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 12:57:28PM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> There is nothing wrong with planning a kitchen sink approach.  The wide
> draft has been adopted by IDR and nothing is stopping people from
> working on it.  But in the best-case situation, it is still many years
> away from wide-scale deployment.

Stop conflating my desire for a common header with my support for wide
communities.  As I mentioned in the base message for this thread, I don't
give a darned whether it's wide, 4:4, 16:4 or the future plethora.

Stop allocating path attributes and forcing people to filter attributes
rather than just add a blanket "drop community type" policy mechanism.

-- Jeff

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email