IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] community of the day - common header

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Mon, 12 September 2016 15:15 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EADD12BA5D for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 08:15:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.009
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.508, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d53FqIWkA3sc for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 08:15:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 095E112B62E for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 07:39:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3014; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1473691152; x=1474900752; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=t9NHLhCH/gtZREDt3Xd0plGo2G/XxGgw6uMq8Q5dIF8=; b=AVfMtmwlxoyYNpPkb+oZ13qRDoptorEGA1Vi/E10rUexEP3jiO4wYR6z ud82YkTi8JpamQiCsayh2jmwekdxWQ+95rckktp9jSjl4oI1HMXl2krV/ 49sUm9n14Nsn2NvU4RNQc8+w0McIhx+pcw2SWtVqZ40iFnw1hPQLq9XUj 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CNAQAivdZX/5JdJa1dFgMBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYM5AQEBAQEeV3wHjSyrGoIDGQuFeQIcgSA4FAECAQEBAQEBAV4nhGIBAQICAQEBIBE6CxACAQgYAgImAgICJQsVEAIEAQ0FFIg2DrNgjCABAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEcgQaJeoRBgwKCWgWZYwGGJHKINYFuTodIhV6IYoNzg3oBHjaEW3CFdX8BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.30,323,1470700800"; d="scan'208";a="148101387"
Received: from rcdn-core-10.cisco.com ([173.37.93.146]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Sep 2016 14:39:11 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-014.cisco.com (xch-rtp-014.cisco.com [64.101.220.154]) by rcdn-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u8CEdAYr011614 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 12 Sep 2016 14:39:11 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-014.cisco.com (64.101.220.154) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 10:39:10 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 10:39:09 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.Nether.net>, Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] community of the day - common header
Thread-Index: AQHSChptYuqCyaDHVUWuiOqD7sKBLA==
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 14:39:09 +0000
Message-ID: <D3FC3607.7DF45%acee@cisco.com>
References: <20160908231840.GB16775@puck.nether.net> <20160909153317.GC8370@pfrc.org> <8C072797-55A7-4D1A-87E4-67551953EF22@puck.nether.net> <20160909155952.GE8370@pfrc.org> <20160909164640.GE79185@Space.Net> <20160909170513.GE12105@pfrc.org> <20160909171110.GF79185@Space.Net> <CA+b+ERnGj0Whz=pYR81vY41bcn6d_4--xDg4eKhNqXtpqDpGzg@mail.gmail.com> <20160909174943.GH79185@Space.Net> <971F5E9E-844D-478D-A30C-CA3C9A4422F3@puck.nether.net> <20160912133029.GA12486@puck.nether.net>
In-Reply-To: <20160912133029.GA12486@puck.nether.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.205]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <C0FE91EF2B93F34CA6E74C0B716BCD94@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/WefPFaeG8Wd-OLSKzLZbG1JbrHk>
Cc: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Subject: Re: [Idr] community of the day - common header
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 15:15:33 -0000

Very good historical perspective - especially for someone who was focused
more on OSPF until last year.
Thanks,
Acee 

On 9/12/16, 9:30 AM, "Idr on behalf of Jared Mauch" <idr-bounces@ietf.org
on behalf of jared@puck.Nether.net> wrote:

>On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 02:03:19PM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote:
>> 
>> > On Sep 9, 2016, at 1:49 PM, Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
>> > 
>> > Hi,
>> > 
>> > On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 07:46:50PM +0200, Robert Raszuk wrote:
>> >> If WG agrees on attribute + common header as described in current -03
>> >> version of wide community draft with perhaps additional comments to
>>be
>> >> incorporated in it - then we are done.
>> > 
>> > And if the WG does not agree, then -large is blocked?  Or how do I
>>have
>> > to read this statement?
>> > 
>> > Seems you and Jakob have been discussing this for years now, while the
>> > operator community is waiting for something they can *just use*, no
>>matter
>> > whether it's brilliant or extensible or perfect.
>> 
>> there was a semi-decent timeline covered at NLNOG today, going back to
>>2002,
>> namely an attempt to do something here:
>> 
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lange-flexible-bgp-communities
>> 
>> Here’s the presentation slides:
>> 
>> https://nlnog.net/static/nlnogday2016/14_NLNOG_large_communities.pdf
>> 
>> I’m hoping there is an archive of the video, as there was palpable
>> frustration from the operator community at the microphone which may
>> help inform the frustration which is here on-list.
>
>here's the video link.
>
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5lM0KwBwBR4
>
>I'd like to point people to the microphone comments to perhaps get
>the perspective from folks running the code that gets standardized as
>a result of the work here.
>
>Comments start shortly after here:
>
>https://youtu.be/5lM0KwBwBR4?t=12m47s
>
>	- Jared
>
>
>-- 
>Jared Mauch  | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net
>clue++;      | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/  My statements are only
>mine.
>
>_______________________________________________
>Idr mailing list
>Idr@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email