Re: [Idr] community of the day - common header

Martin Millnert <millnert@gmail.com> Wed, 14 September 2016 11:32 UTC

Return-Path: <millnert@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CFD512B2DC for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 04:32:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ywRr0TR06Ou4 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 04:32:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22e.google.com (mail-lf0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05E9812B2E7 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 04:32:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id l131so7729324lfl.2 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 04:32:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6o6h9bGbKJvtd7l32dhEMx7n5us5D8OEUKBBlj6X4pc=; b=EtSn/gJ7sdMfRex1cKRZS7N7U40xtKkU/MkGVMBXveIPWLGLugkuK13vkDMj0syxiL baIoNKJHKOUYWtpx50HcOZfUNLjYRxLIH72zt/c+jP0YLbCHNGlzAOeGh4KlU2yaeWnI Qpb+83msaCKbNTx88TV2rlor0tkRAQ35VkWF7z+7wpJNFagMYfFPYg696+5rK4FZqedM 5sAyNxWbxkln2nG8JUsJOBpNk6dmkC390Xpv6TH0hpdBnyZVutWvogyqomUq7yLvAXk3 gCzNHGFS5V+o/K6qu8Fm2p0OJUEoCFd9E1sY0oRmgT4R2cNhiWoZiNQIxOxDI2Edbisz vRQw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6o6h9bGbKJvtd7l32dhEMx7n5us5D8OEUKBBlj6X4pc=; b=E4uZPcLfrfs+PBTSiAUgh3YJ0IuFfN/TuplLPNtVt+8wo9i6cbL1lH5FfrY0WQDWZ9 VJ/f1ISCOcLHhejUJ257xXsIJ4paUM0plNPf8T8lxepNk4gE10p247lXE5yRcCXiAsO9 SlmhYy+qzlWv5mWl9sBnirUg0JP+/2/kAzMr/KdiUYvjOUjsK7T3i0yu9yA0Ni10vFSI BUjP6+L0aRod8HW8uZ6ilWYVPah92Xx0DOe/UWvj2g01yhaKIVk1EVxhKyhEBSk936mr DuteQMMScgP/J4xoFaVFgakDChjal8Sc0zS9JHr0dU3RL7nL1Ny0qRkqro56/2tceqc7 ngTA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwPMGdudVVjPlysbxEvsZeznayvL/BYtJDR+2V8qAeTOZDNVoDabWncL1C3wvehMQA==
X-Received: by 10.46.69.2 with SMTP id s2mr848120lja.44.1473852774158; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 04:32:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from galileo.millnert.se (gw.ipnett.ideon.se. [85.235.1.171]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id h65sm4797121lfi.35.2016.09.14.04.32.52 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 14 Sep 2016 04:32:52 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1473852771.19944.152.camel@gmail.com>
From: Martin Millnert <millnert@gmail.com>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>, Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 13:32:51 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CA+b+ERmh6nJR8TMv7AzRXZsERgN9i+EFH_Rvc77Q_9fuySEkQw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20160908231840.GB16775@puck.nether.net> <20160909153317.GC8370@pfrc.org> <8C072797-55A7-4D1A-87E4-67551953EF22@puck.nether.net> <20160909155952.GE8370@pfrc.org> <20160909164640.GE79185@Space.Net> <20160909170513.GE12105@pfrc.org> <20160909171110.GF79185@Space.Net> <CA+b+ERnGj0Whz=pYR81vY41bcn6d_4--xDg4eKhNqXtpqDpGzg@mail.gmail.com> <20160909174943.GH79185@Space.Net> <20160909180841.GA14495@pfrc.org> <20160909182449.GI79185@Space.Net> <CA+b+ERmh6nJR8TMv7AzRXZsERgN9i+EFH_Rvc77Q_9fuySEkQw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5-1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/ReJ1xtKS9R9E0bfrYjqGbng_t88>
Cc: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] community of the day - common header
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 11:32:58 -0000

On Fri, 2016-09-09 at 20:48 +0200, Robert Raszuk wrote:
> > If 10+ years is the *norm* for geting something done, this is worse
> > than
> > I assumed.
> 
> All I can say that regardless if this is 5 years or 10 years new
> functionality in BGP take that long when you add IETF process,
> vendor's priorities and deployment rollout all together. 

Robert, I believe your explanation is correct.

It could probably be mentioned in the footprint somewhere that
interdependencies of protocol changes are often complex, and some times
the changes themselves become complex as a result.

To combat that, minimizing cognitive load and complexities helps. As a
guide line:
    "A designer knows he has achieved perfection not when there is
    nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to take away."
      -- Antoine de Saint-Exupery

I believe the thinking such as behind this particular change in Large
[1] is a good example of this in action, and encouraging to see.

Best,
Martin 
[1] https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-heitz-idr-large-community-02.txt