IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] community of the day - common header

Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> Fri, 09 September 2016 15:06 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@foobar.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09A4712B46F for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Sep 2016 08:06:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YAe7DhiSMHWm for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Sep 2016 08:06:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.netability.ie (mail.netability.ie [IPv6:2a03:8900:0:100::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C54EC12B4BE for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Sep 2016 08:00:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Envelope-To: idr@ietf.org
Received: from crumpet.local (089-101-195156.ntlworld.ie [89.101.195.156] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.netability.ie (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u89ExxGi062052 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 9 Sep 2016 15:59:59 +0100 (IST) (envelope-from nick@foobar.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: cheesecake.ibn.ie: Host 089-101-195156.ntlworld.ie [89.101.195.156] (may be forged) claimed to be crumpet.local
Message-ID: <57D2CE6E.8050003@foobar.org>
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2016 15:59:58 +0100
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 4.0.8 (Macintosh/20151105)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
References: <20160908214031.GA23544@pfrc.org> <57D2A3A8.70904@foobar.org> <CA+b+ERkPVL_5bAP3V+ugw7JJfsX=hy=YOD6X45z=6Gb8T1dc=A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+b+ERkPVL_5bAP3V+ugw7JJfsX=hy=YOD6X45z=6Gb8T1dc=A@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2.3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/8pvbSpkLYiE-WFPgoICMoR9pERY>
Cc: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] community of the day - common header
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2016 15:06:56 -0000

Robert,

Robert Raszuk wrote:
> Yesterday you said that you would *not like* to see an attribute for
> large community (fixed 4:4:4), an attribute for Nx4, an attribute for
> 16+Nx4 and an attribute for wide. You assume it is large & wide only. 

As I mentioned yesterday, there was a misunderstanding on both our parts:

https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr/current/msg16093.html

Let me clarify:

- I am happy for -large- to have its own path attribute, but haven't
said anything about path attributes for any other proposal.

- let's discuss -wide- as a separate issue to -large- so that neither of
them is dependent on the other.

Nick

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email