Re: [Idr] community of the day - common header

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Thu, 22 September 2016 18:56 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42DD012B644 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 11:56:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.837
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.837 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.316, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pGITyL7r9sCO for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 11:56:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C1E912B64E for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 11:56:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1840; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1474570617; x=1475780217; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=gmsi8qZAhH59Kg5L1S9KiaIMGNKWl+e7t3Y6U8ZXrhw=; b=A+pvaxnv7QkIbKgnpQvbxDK6kSa1OwvZoasnrbE8rMUke3dBBs7A2IVv 20bn9K/QZBAgpV0oJPeDvhjwZc3U5kZW3xH57H4fbgkXgdoB6xSx+/AhL JFNh/UPfmtJPZYN2Dr74DiNpQumGssUK5gryMdQuOkUo5jvN/rtB9eW08 U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AkAQBjKORX/4QNJK1eGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBgzsBAQEBAR5XfAeNLKtFggQZC4V6AhyBTjgUAQIBAQEBAQEBXieEYgEBBAEBARoGEToLEAIBCBgCAiYCAgIlCxUQAgQBDQUUiDcOrzCMTQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARcFgQaKBYdIgloBBJl1AY9lj2yMaIN7AR42hQVyhhB/AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.30,379,1470700800"; d="scan'208";a="325437030"
Received: from alln-core-10.cisco.com ([173.36.13.132]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 22 Sep 2016 18:56:56 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com (xch-rtp-015.cisco.com [64.101.220.155]) by alln-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u8MIuuD9024539 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 22 Sep 2016 18:56:56 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 14:56:55 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 14:56:55 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>, Gert Doering <gert@space.net>, John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] community of the day - common header
Thread-Index: AQHSChptYuqCyaDHVUWuiOqD7sKBLKBxTD0ngABEo4D//854ooAABuF4gAe1ZACAANdPgIALJY8AgABcWQCAAHrpgIAAFbUAgAAoIICAAADIgP//w5cA
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 18:56:55 +0000
Message-ID: <D409A119.80414%acee@cisco.com>
References: <20160909164640.GE79185@Space.Net> <20160909170513.GE12105@pfrc.org> <20160909171110.GF79185@Space.Net> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1609141250080.1477@uplift.swm.pp.se> <m27faedp12.wl-randy@psg.com> <4166dc4d49e944cba2ddfad3896cf8e9@XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com> <D4094D30.5EAE1%bduvivie@cisco.com> <716F3D8B-FF7D-45EF-9AE4-9EC202A6E2F4@gmail.com> <64C65776-5F07-44AA-B7A0-F8C4CE896EE8@juniper.net> <20160922183015.GK79185@Space.Net> <20160922183303.GA47354@Vurt.local>
In-Reply-To: <20160922183303.GA47354@Vurt.local>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.114.204]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <1868FE10F25CBA4E9972D49323E218FF@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/WqLtw0JYsZbQH3JPZVB51r6y77U>
Cc: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] community of the day - common header
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 18:56:59 -0000

Hi John, 
But it would be better to have the common header discussion now rather
than during WGLC. Can we then assume that the discussion has concluded and
that the requirement for a common header is off the table?
Thanks,
Acee 

On 9/22/16, 2:33 PM, "Idr on behalf of Job Snijders" <idr-bounces@ietf.org
on behalf of job@ntt.net> wrote:

>Hi Gert,
>
>On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 08:30:15PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:06:38PM -0400, John G. Scudder wrote:
>> > Folks, the adoption call for large has completed, the result has
>> > been announced, there is not really any need to continue to debate
>> > this. If you have a point to make that you think will make people
>> > smarter and hasn't been made five or six times already in the last
>> > two weeks, go for it, but IMHO we especially don't need "+1"
>> > messages.
>> 
>> my +1 was not on "adoption" but on Jakob's position regarding common
>> header, after WG adoption.
>
>Yes, that was clear. I think that John is encouraging the working group
>to provide new arguments or new information (or new counter arguments)
>rather than upvote posts made by others.
>
>Thanks!
>
>Kind regards,
>
>Job
>
>_______________________________________________
>Idr mailing list
>Idr@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr