IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] community of the day - common header

Job Snijders <job@ntt.net> Thu, 22 September 2016 18:33 UTC

Return-Path: <job@ntt.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 568A812B36A for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 11:33:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.251
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.251 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.316, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ClpFDpBh562R for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 11:33:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.mlpsca01.us.to.gin.ntt.net (mail3.mlpsca01.us.to.gin.ntt.net [IPv6:2001:418:3ff:3::22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF51712B365 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 11:33:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail3.mlpsca01.us.to.gin.ntt.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <job@ntt.net>) id 1bn8nz-0004zb-76 (job@us.ntt.net); Thu, 22 Sep 2016 18:33:08 +0000
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 20:33:03 +0200
From: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>
To: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
Message-ID: <20160922183303.GA47354@Vurt.local>
References: <20160909164640.GE79185@Space.Net> <20160909170513.GE12105@pfrc.org> <20160909171110.GF79185@Space.Net> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1609141250080.1477@uplift.swm.pp.se> <m27faedp12.wl-randy@psg.com> <4166dc4d49e944cba2ddfad3896cf8e9@XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com> <D4094D30.5EAE1%bduvivie@cisco.com> <716F3D8B-FF7D-45EF-9AE4-9EC202A6E2F4@gmail.com> <64C65776-5F07-44AA-B7A0-F8C4CE896EE8@juniper.net> <20160922183015.GK79185@Space.Net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160922183015.GK79185@Space.Net>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.0 (2016-08-17)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/ShZKDT6e6uimVI0lqIfeVeKqXlo>
Cc: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] community of the day - common header
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 18:33:12 -0000

Hi Gert,

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 08:30:15PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:06:38PM -0400, John G. Scudder wrote:
> > Folks, the adoption call for large has completed, the result has
> > been announced, there is not really any need to continue to debate
> > this. If you have a point to make that you think will make people
> > smarter and hasn't been made five or six times already in the last
> > two weeks, go for it, but IMHO we especially don't need "+1"
> > messages.
> 
> my +1 was not on "adoption" but on Jakob's position regarding common
> header, after WG adoption.

Yes, that was clear. I think that John is encouraging the working group
to provide new arguments or new information (or new counter arguments)
rather than upvote posts made by others.

Thanks!

Kind regards,

Job

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email